Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightwingcrazy
Hold Facebook accountable to what it said it would do when it took people's money.

From Facebook's IPO Prospectus dated May 3, 2012 (emphasis mine):


Our mission is to make the world more open and connected.

People use Facebook to stay connected with their friends and family, to discover what is going on in the world around them, and to share and express what matters to them to the people they care about.

Developers can use the Facebook Platform to build applications (apps) and websites that integrate with Facebook to reach our global network of users and to build products that are more personalized, social, and engaging.

Advertisers can engage with more than 900 million monthly active users (MAUs) on Facebook or subsets of our users based on information they have chosen to share with us such as their age, location, gender, or interests. We offer advertisers a unique combination of reach, relevance, social context, and engagement to enhance the value of their ads.

We believe that we are at the forefront of enabling faster, easier, and richer communication between people and that Facebook has become an integral part of many of our users’ daily lives. We have experienced rapid growth in the number of users and their engagement.

[snip -- the following emphasis is Facebook's from the prospectus]

How We Create Value for Users

Our top priority is to build useful and engaging products that enable you to:

Foundations of the Social Web

We believe that the web, including the mobile web, is evolving to become more social and personalized. This evolution is creating more rewarding experiences that are centered on people, their connections, and their interests. We believe that the following elements form the foundation of the social web:


That is what Zuckerberg sold to investors when he went public with Facebook. Is that what is happening now? Doesn't the prospectus describe a public forum where all viewpoints are equally tolerated?

The prospectus said:

Express Yourself. We enable our users to share and publish their opinions, ideas, photos, and activities to audiences ranging from their closest friends to our 900 million users, giving every user a voice within the Facebook community.

Is Facebook making good on its promise to "enable our users to share and publish their opinions" and "give every user a voice within the Facebook community?"

Set aside, for the moment, the banning of conservatives from the platform. What about the advertisers who are losing access to that audience?

The prospectus said:

Advertisers can engage with more than 900 million monthly active users (MAUs) on Facebook or subsets of our users based on information they have chosen to share with us such as their age, location, gender, or interests. We offer advertisers a unique combination of reach, relevance, social context, and engagement to enhance the value of their ads.

Facebook is now denying access to large segments of banned users that advertisers expected to be there when they invested in building their storefronts on Facebook.

Finally, the prospectus said:

We believe that we are at the forefront of enabling faster, easier, and richer communication between people and that Facebook has become an integral part of many of our users’ daily lives.

By their own admission, their users have made Facebook "an integral part... of users' daily lives." Now Facebook wants to rip that away from people after people invested so much time and energy into it?

These should be the main arguments against Facebook.

-PJ

17 posted on 10/17/2018 1:29:32 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

That’s not a legal contract.

“That is what Zuckerberg sold to investors when he went public with Facebook”

Well that’s between him and shareholders, not a SCOTUS case.


31 posted on 10/17/2018 1:56:08 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

This leads to questions about SEC violations even civil suits for fraud.


45 posted on 10/17/2018 2:32:47 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

You nailed it.

I can’t believe that so many on Free Republic are so simple minded that they think that Facebook deceiving investors and participants, whose identities the company traffics for revenue and market share, should be able to rob members of their status, reputation, and earning potential on the whims of company (or third-party) censors.

Regulating these big, multi-national companies is not at all a “slippery slope” by which websites such as this one will become regulated.

Free Republic is not publicly traded. It is and always has been up front about its policies and stated mission. And it does not include members being able to become famous or earn an income from their postings here.

There are many thousands of people who have built large income streams on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and others and are now being “deplatformed” and robbed of their rightful reputations and earnings after they helped build the rising popularity of these platforms.


76 posted on 10/17/2018 4:57:01 PM PDT by unlearner (A war is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson