[E. Pluribus Unum]

I don’t have a problem with them censoring users.

I have a problem with them not enforcing their terms of service for a long period of time and then dropping the hammer just before a critical election.

That’s election tampering.

If they had been censoring conservatives all along there would be plenty of conservative sites filling the void.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Exactly.

[rightwingcrazy]

There is a host of regulations related to political action committees and other political organizations, campaign financing, etc. Even setting aside First Amendment issues, these rules need to be reconciled to make sure the scales aren’t being tipped in one direction.

[tbw2]

Agree on the election tampering.

The Terms of Service argument isn’t valid. They’re redefining terms so that offensive and unacceptable refers to polite repeating of conservative views. While liberals literally calling for violence or hash tags like kill all whites, kill all men, etc are somehow just find with liberal “trust and safety” councils.

[TXnMA]

"I have a problem with them not enforcing their terms of service for a long period of time and then dropping the hammer just before a critical election."

"That’s election tampering."

Worth repeating -- and emphasizing.

TXnMA
 

[Drew68]

I have a problem with them not enforcing their terms of service for a long period of time and then dropping the hammer just before a critical election.

Not to mention their TOS seems applicable only to conservatives. There’s countless examples on Twitter of the vilest comments made by liberals allowed to stand while conservatives are banned at the whim of Jack Dorsey for the slightest transgressions, or none at all.