Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LouieFisk

No they have not. On the altar of getting a broader consensus than 5-4, the SCOTUS decision was based on the biased rights commission, not on the underlying principle. That’s why the Colorado Baker is right back in the situation he was in the first place. If my memory is correct, the next lawsuit has already been filed


17 posted on 10/18/2018 6:03:03 PM PDT by j.havenfarm ( 1,500 posts as of 8/10/18. A FReeper since 2000; never shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: j.havenfarm

This is why we have to demand that the SCOTUS actually decide issues completely.


18 posted on 10/18/2018 6:09:11 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: j.havenfarm

“the SCOTUS decision was based on the biased rights commission”

I see. Though I think there would still be some precedence set re:government agencies issuing like demands.


22 posted on 10/18/2018 6:25:15 PM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: j.havenfarm

the colorado decision was bullstalin to begin with. the state itself did not recognize same sex marriages when they tried to force the baker to recognize a same sex marriage.


32 posted on 10/18/2018 6:58:47 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson