[Starboard]

Yep, groundless accusations and even the absence of criminal activity are now enough to charge someone. You’re guilty simply because they say you are, and because they said it, its credible.

[fluorescence]

“The hallmark of a good criminal is the ability to cover his tracks and Trump's were very well covered indeed... so well covered that our investigations turned up nothing. Nevertheless, the rumors and innuendo that our associates spread about Trump was overwhelming, so when we couldn't anything at all on him we knew we were hot on the trail of a real high-level conspiracy. Our report is therefore based on the presumption of guilt, by way of overwhelming circumstantial evidence given by various third-parties with no personal connection to the Trump campaign and who were just sore about losing, whom we consider to be highly credible and impartial witnesses. We are determined that a lack of any specific allegation of wrongdoing will not prevent us from bringing this mentally incompetent international criminal mastermind to justice.”

[magna carta]

maybe we could just call it Ford’s Law

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

#6/ Right. Let’s call this the “Kavanaugh Syndrome”. You must be guilty if someone accused you of something but they don’t have to prove it. Just take their word for it (or mine, Christine Balless Ford).