Yesterday:
Chris Wallace calls Trump ‘preposterous’ for suggesting Democrats are behind border surge
Wallace was discussing the escalation of Trump’s rhetoric leading up to the November midterm elections and said he has no evidence to back up his claims.What constitutes evidence in a Lefto-urinalist's mind? Receipts? A bank statement? More than Russian collusion?“Let me say first of all that the idea that the Democrats were somehow behind this caravan coming from Honduras of these women and children is preposterous,” Wallace said.
Wallace also said there’s no evidence to support the claim the protesters at Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation were paid to be there.
“And there’s been no evidence offered on that any more than there was evidence that the protesters up on Capitol Hill during the Kavanaugh hearings were paid protesters,” he said.
There’s no “evidence” Wall ass has a brain either....
The legal definition of the word “evidence” requires a document, item, statement, etc be accepted in a court case in a court of law. This had to be the definiton that the Clinton’s were using when they so frequently said,...there is no evidence.