Strange definition of free speech. Nobody is above criticism, and that goes for the schizophrenic sand hermit, Mohammed Ali, a seventh-century L. Ron Hubbard, who invented a crackpot religion of his own.
Dianetics is but another version of Sharia Law, restated in somewhat gentler terms, but but both are a pernicious perversion of the philosophies upon which each is based.
Those who defect from either of these cults are declared to be “persons without grace”, and may be persecuted in various different ways, depending on the circumstances. Neither cult is amenable to any kind of “reform”, only that the Original Prophet of each is the Ultimate Authority, and may not be mocked.
Talk abut taking an impregnable position.
“Dianetics is but another version of Sharia Law”
Never thought of it that way. Thanks.