Posted on 10/28/2018 4:13:53 PM PDT by deport
It would appear a little more balanced if you’d have mentioned women, too, in your posts.
I have no respect for someone voting for the lesbian in Georgia. Nor the ones in Houston that voted in that idiot lesbian mayor years ago.
Whether they be male or female voters.
He will end up looking like McCauley Culkin as a teenager—guaranteed. Poor kid. Pray for him.
OK, your wish is my command.
To all of you women who would trick men into getting you pregnant so you can have babies without marriage, don't do it, it's wrong.
Now, do any of you men honestly believe that any woman who was planning to trick a man into getting her pregnant so that she and her lesbian lover can have babies without marriage will now reconsider because I told her to? If so, then have at it. Just don't cry to me when you're making child support payments to children you have no rights to.
I doubt he was tricked. He probably sold it to them or some bank.
If that dude wound up with child support, I don’t think I’d have any sympathy.
But then I don’t know what kind of legal entanglements they wind up with.
In this case it was a donor, but what’s the difference? Whether you’re donating deliberately or shooting your sperm all over the landscape with no concern for what can happen, the results are largely the same.
Once again, you failed to mention women who “sell” their eggs, “surrogate services”.
Are you on a man-hating binge or what? I don’t get it.
Your posts are rather one-sided.
Fair enough, but these women aren't the reason almost half of children are born into fatherless families.
Are you on a man-hating binge or what? I don’t get it.
If I was a man hater, I would be encouraging men to continue doing what they're doing.
Your posts are rather one-sided.
So is the money spent supporting feminists vs. the money spent by men supporting MRAs, or the money spent on prostitution. Look at these one-sided differences. Do you like what you see?
I don't.
My only point to you, waaaaaaay back, is I don’t understand why voters would vote for an open lesbian in Georgia.
Given that the gays are probably 2% to 2.5%.
Supposedly.
I just don’t understand what the 98% (of Democrats) are thinking. But then, I don’t understand most Democrats these days.
I think the problem is more general than that, but you’re right too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.