Posted on 10/29/2018 10:12:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Half such articles lament that tech will leave us with no jobs, half that demographics will leave us with no workers.
Seems to me as if there might be a match in trends.
I thought millenials were larger then baby boomers.
I think it’s because sex is now recreational, marriage is now optional and children are now an inconvenience rather than a blessing, because it’s all about MEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
So the WIFE can stay home?
I have 4 children...all productive citizens. I have always had a career.
For the few times I played stay-at-home mommy, it was mind numbing. The funny thing is this..My children went to private christian school. Most of the moms were stay-at-homes. Their kids came to school in not always clean wrinkled uniforms, lunchables for lunch, and they rarely volunteered for anything they didn’t have to. Their houses were a spectacular mess too.
My children had clean, pressed uniforms everyday. At least a 5 course packed lunch and it was me and the other career mom who volunteered for most of the events. My house was clean and tidy all of the time. The Suzy’s always expected us to donate money too because we had “extra” money.
My hubs on the other had would have loved to stay home and deal with kid and house stuff. Why assume its always the mom that should do it?
Shouldnt it be, in a free society?
I don't know why. Maybe it is that horrible science named biology and that evil thing called history? I will be the first to admit that biology is predictive, not determinative. If a woman truly does not like kids and/or raising them it be a crime to inflict her upon them. Also, if a wife has a greater earnings potential than the husband it might be wise to have the woman be the breadwinner. That being said there's a strong case for saying that women will be much happier and successful than men raising children.
If I could convince a supermodel to marry me and put a baby in her I would be happy to be a stay at home dad.
bump
Anymore the leftist-lesbians consider children/pregnancy to be a disease that must be treated right away.
As if children were some form of cancer or something.
Sad, sick, degenerate souls.
Parasites are, of course, best dealt with by killing them.
Evil bloody minded, bloody handed bastards ...
i dont know... im on several forums where 2nd wives have to deal with the machinations of the baby mama who have all the legal power to make dad’s life miserable.
I agree that my concern is for a more culturally conservative and Christian nation.
I’m talking about this in moral terms, not legal terms. Legally, it should be optional.
Ive been single all my life, and am likely to remain so. Are you asserting thats a moral failing?
No. I’m single as well. But marriage is better than shacking up or having flings.
Until the marital contract has more legal “sticking power” than the 30-day return policy at my local Wal-Mart and abortion-on-demand is rescinded, you will not even START to see the birthrate increase. An actual baby BOOM? Forget it.
It should not be forced, but it should be strongly emphasized as a life goal, and it damn well should not be actively sabotaged.
My parents are expressing similar sentiments as I’m the oldest of 6. It’s hard on our father who is mentally stuck in an era 40 years ago where housing, food and gasoline were not just “cheaper” but actually in line with what a single entry level job could provide for.
Hell the Obamaconomy plus a couple shady employers cost me 6 years just to get to the point where even thinking about a family was financially viable.
I actually support liberals not having children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.