Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So she gets raped in 2010 and does not report it to the police. Then, in Sept 2018, she FIRST sees a picture of Mueller in the paper (after he’s been getting continuous coverage for over 16 months) and decides he is the one who raped her.

Hmmmm.....I am no fan of Mueller, but this is just ridiculous.


33 posted on 10/30/2018 2:20:44 PM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rbg81

Just like the Arkansas Attorney General (Slick) raping Juanita Broadrick while he’s launching his campaign for Governor. Had she came forward then she certainly would have succumbed to Arkancide, for sure.

Who in their right mind who accuse the FBI director, short of having the taped evidence or multiple witnesses to prove the assault and a 24/7 fleet of bodyguards?


43 posted on 10/30/2018 2:31:23 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81

Concur. This is right out of the Avenetti playbook, with one major difference. Because the target of the Creepy Porn Lawyer was Trump, the media was all in on the story from Day One. In this case, the accuser could have a tape of a roll in the hay with Mueller and the press would ignore it. And, based on what I’ve heard so far, it sounds like she has nothing more than her version of events and the story she told to a couple of friends.

If you’re a Republican, such scant allegations are enough to convict. If you’re Mueller, your denials are sufficient, and the stenographers in the media are carefully reporting the “women claim they were paid to accuse Mueller of rape” angle.

Our side should be better than this. One reason there’s a red wave forming ahead of election day is that millions of Americans are fuming that a man of tremendous character and integrity, Bret Kavanaugh, was slandered with easily disproved allegations of sexual misconduct. Tempted they might be, conservatives shouldn’t follow that sordid example.


45 posted on 10/30/2018 2:36:08 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81
8 years is far more credible than 35.

AND she could give contemporary details (e.g. the local weather report).

And she says she called a friend within a day.

78 posted on 10/30/2018 6:18:51 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81
This is why the Dems went overboard, all in, on Kavanaugh.

1) Always accuse your opponents of what YOU are doing.

2) Always do it first, so your charges stick while you call them copycats.

79 posted on 10/30/2018 6:21:37 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81

Mueller’s history in LE smells like week old fish.
That’s what he should be called on.


126 posted on 10/31/2018 9:29:19 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60's....You weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81

Better than 36 years ago. Let him sweat a while.


131 posted on 10/31/2018 10:16:49 AM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson