What?
Absolutely not a Constitutional Amendment
No.
It may require legislation, but the Constitution says NOTHING about birthright citizenship that I know of. (called “Jus soli”, and only we and Canada have it among developed countries)
Am I wrong on this?
a twisted interpretation of the 14th makes them think it is.
Not on the face of it.
IMO, neither an amendment or a statute is required. If Trump issues an EO and directs his various depts. to proceed the left/globalists/RINO's will have a hissy fit and take it to the Judiciary. Fair enough.
In this instance, Trump would merely be cleaning up an inappropriate policy within the Executive Branch.
The single statute the globalists rely on (Title 8, Sect. 1401), beyond cleaning up a few contemporaneous issues, went beyond the language of the 14thA to narrowly include Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe.
To suppose Congress intended to redefine the "jurisdiction" element of the 14thA by also including onsite born children of illegal entrants seems a significant defect.