Squirrel!!!!!!
is he in trouble or what
Desperation.
He’d never stand up to Schumer and break ranks.
Nice try—that sounds nice. But his lips are moving...and we all know what that means coming from a Democrat in Congress.
Sounds kinda desperate to me.
Desperation.
He’d never stand up to Schumer and break ranks.
Interest iui ng discussion on this topic on Fox News Ingraham now. They convinced me that the Constitution has two requirements, not just born here.
I’ve stood for secure borders with John McCain when in 2013, we passed legislation that would have provided an additional 20,000 border agents to the border,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Build the wall instead. You don’t have to pay a lifetime pension for a wall.
The only times Donnelly has ever voted outside of Schumer and Reids wishes, is when his “aye” vote would not change the outcome.
Odd that he is running his campaign claiming to be the Trumpiest of the 3 candidates
Believe this lying scumbag sob and I’ll sell you some prime property in Mexico Beach FL...
Bye Felipe
“I’ve stood for secure borders with John McCain when in 2013, we passed legislation that would have provided an additional 20,000 border agents to the border,”
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What he voted for was an amnesty that would have spelled the end of the Republic.
It was only us voters of the VA-7 taking down the weasel Eric Cantor that saved the country.
They were scheduled to pass Rubio’s Gang of Amnesty bill the very next day using Democrat and Bush League Republican votes in the House.
So here’s the claim - Only an amendment to the constitution can change “birthright citizenship”.
But the 14th Amendment is being interpreted wrongly! Why is it necessary to produce another Amendment when there is nothing wrong with the old one. The _author_ of the 14th Amendment stated in no uncertain terms it does not apply to foreigners. So why are we making this so difficult?
How did it come to pass that nobody believed this crap in 1920 or 1940 or 1960? All of a sudden, somebody decided to look at things different. Who was that? Who gave the green light on that?
Why does congress act like spectators? “I’m open to looking at legislation...”
Wow! Profiles In Courage right there. Don’t be fooled. There is a remedy, they just don’t want to do it, and they sure as hell don’t want you to know about it.
Somebody needs to ask him point blank - YES or NO - forget the Constitution for a second...do YOU believe someone who is in the country illegally or on vacation and births a child...*should* that child automatically get US Citizenship? Don’t allow him to weasel his way out with words about “I’ll look at it”.
[”I heard you say that Lindsey Graham is going to put legislation forward” to rescind the law, ]
What the hell has happened the Lindsey Graham? LOL
We need to review it. And if I win, forget it like I do with all promises.
Too little, too late Donnelly. You can’t change your colors (yellow) at the last moment and think that sane people will believe you.
since there is no constitutional right to “birthright citizenship” for babies or children of foreign nationals visiting or residing in the USA,
and since (to the very best of my knowledge) there is no law creating such a ‘right’ either
no law is needed to terminate this illegal conferral of American citizenships
He has to think he’s behind the power curve...hope we finish him off.
He’s like the democratic version of Charlie Baker lol