Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bannon, ex-Trump officials talked Roger Stone, WikiLeaks with Mueller: report
The Hill ^ | 11/01/18 | Jacqueline Thomsen

Posted on 11/01/2018 1:16:51 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

Steve Bannon and two other former senior Trump campaign staffers have told members of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team that Roger Stone, an informal adviser to Trump, cast himself as a way for the campaign to obtain information from WikiLeaks, The New York Times reported Thursday.

Bannon reportedly spoke with members of Mueller's team on Friday, his third interview with the special counsel, according to multiple media reports.

Bannon and the other former Trump campaign officials were reportedly pressed on Stone's statements about WikiLeaks, and told investigators working for Mueller that Stone gave the impression that he had a direct line to the group, according to The Times.

Stone had claimed to have prior knowledge that the organization would release documents damaging to Hillary Clinton ahead of the 2016 presidential election, and one former Trump campaign official told Mueller's team that he appeared to take credit for the timing of the document's release, the newspaper reported.

WikiLeaks published emails hacked from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta in the weeks leading up to the election. Those emails were later revealed to have been obtained by Russian operatives, and Mueller earlier this year indicted 12 Russian military officers on charges related to the hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Stone also appeared to want to share information about the hacked emails with Bannon before they were publicly shared, according to emails obtained and published by The Times on Thursday.

On Oct. 3, 2016, Breitbart News’ Washington editor Matthew Boyle emailed Stone about a press conference WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was set to hold the next day, during which Assange promised to release a new trove of documents.

Stone replied to Boyle that same day, saying that he would tell Bannon — then the head of Breitbart — about the contents of the documents but “he doesn’t call me back.”

Boyle then forwarded the correspondence to Bannon, telling him that he “should call Roger” and that he didn’t get the information “from me.”

“I’ve got important stuff to worry about,” Bannon replied.

“Well clearly he knows what Assange has,” Boyle wrote back. “I’d say that’s important.”

Assange held his conference the next morning, announcing that he planned to release “significant material” each week for the coming months, some of which was related to the U.S. presidential election.

The Times also obtained an email Bannon sent to Stone after Assange’s press conference, asking “What was that this morning???”

Stone replied the same day saying that Assange has a “serious security concern.”

“He thinks they are going to kill him and the London police are standing done,” Stone wrote.

“However —a load every week going forward,” he added.

“He didn’t cut deal w/ clintons???” Bannon asked.

Stone has denied having inside knowledge of WikiLeaks' actions, and has instead claimed that New York comedian and former radio host Randy Credico was his source. Credico has testified before Mueller's grand jury about Stone.

ETC...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bannon; mueller; rogerstone; wikileaks
Michael Caputo has said he believes Muellers' ultimate target was Roger Stone and his alleged relationship with Wikileaks.

If Mueller can tie Stone to Wikileaks he can tie Trump to a 'collusion' narrative.

1 posted on 11/01/2018 1:16:51 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Who gives a ####?

It won’t stand up in a court and it’s too nonsensical for 2/3 of the senate to kick a president out over.

I worried about this bull sh.t for a year.

i’m done worrying

i’ll leave it to you and others


2 posted on 11/01/2018 1:20:13 PM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Mueller is going to have to make up some more laws here.


3 posted on 11/01/2018 1:20:21 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Ah, good to see Mueller’s leakers have their October surprise cooked up just in time to interfere with the election.

Have been waiting. Mueller must be pretty mad that the other side sand bagged him with the rape allegation, distracted him.


4 posted on 11/01/2018 1:21:35 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

WikiLeaks published emails hacked from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta in the weeks leading up to the election.

~~~

Never anything to do with Russia. It’s always been about revenge for Hillary


5 posted on 11/01/2018 1:22:47 PM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

If I’m a dem, I’m thinking “Please tell me you have something better than this!”


6 posted on 11/01/2018 1:23:01 PM PDT by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Mueller, Rosie, Sleepy and the Whole Bunch need to be FIRED in one week


7 posted on 11/01/2018 1:24:41 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat ("Mods/Indies/Dems/Non-voters" JOBS or MOBS? Are CRAZY DIMS REALLY who you want BACK in POWER?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

No, yesthatjallen, he won’t be able to tie it to a collusion narrative...there is no “there” there. There is NO collusion.

And the documentation seen and investigation already taken place illustrates this to all but the most rabid and brain dead leftists. Even many in the news media know the jig is up, but will milk it for all it is worth just to generate a Two Minutes Hate as long as they can.

It is a pipe dream, and once the election is over, this is going to go one of two ways: If the Dems win, Mueller keeps going, throwing mud but finding nothing. If the Republicans win, Mueller is dead man walking.


8 posted on 11/01/2018 1:25:08 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc

By Dem standards, that’s not a story you can sink your teeth into. They’re not even at the Smoke & Mirrors stage just yet.
Rumor of the effects of rumors of the effect of rumors.


9 posted on 11/01/2018 1:26:06 PM PDT by lee martell (AT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc

Yeah, it’s hilarious — Roger Stone has an inside line to Wikileaks?

Oh The Horrors.

Who doesn’t.

Stone has no clearance so he could be accused of what?


10 posted on 11/01/2018 1:26:22 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

What’s the big deal? Mainstream journalists have direct pipelines to illegal leakers all the time.


11 posted on 11/01/2018 1:26:34 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc
If I’m a dem, I’m thinking “Please tell me you have something better than this!”

They thought Trump getting extra dessert was the last straw that would get him impeached or removed by the 25th Amendment or somehow make Hillary president. I imagine they are thrilled to hear something even bigger today.


12 posted on 11/01/2018 1:28:43 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

More meaningless loose associations and Stone’s hysteria.


13 posted on 11/01/2018 1:30:01 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc
If I’m a dem, I’m thinking “Please tell me you have something better than this!”

If Mueller can't prove collusion he can at least hang a cloud of questions over Trump.

This gives the media the opportunity to keep inserting rumors into news stories about Trump.

14 posted on 11/01/2018 1:33:03 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Looks pretty weak to me. Stone trying to make himself look connected with information that was already widely known. They are trying to get Stone on a process crime, nothing more.


15 posted on 11/01/2018 1:34:30 PM PDT by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
If Mueller can tie Stone to Wikileaks he can tie Trump to a 'collusion' narrative.

Okay thanks for that. So you're done running your fkn hole?

16 posted on 11/01/2018 1:52:55 PM PDT by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Worth watching Dershowitz on Tucker last night. The main takeaway is even IF Mueller subpoena’s Trump, Trump will launch his legal opposition to the subpoena, which could take YEARS.

LOL. There is nothing for Democrats to gain from a Subpoena.


17 posted on 11/01/2018 2:15:08 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Bingo.

Mueller’s problem with Roger Stone is that Stone is a flame-thrower and a bs artist.

Stone constantly puffs himself up as someone in the know when he most of the time is not.

Stone is a useless informant and no good as a witness because of his constant loose talk.

That’s why Mueller hasn’t had this “central” figure in front of a grand jury yet and I don’t think ever will.


18 posted on 11/01/2018 3:05:29 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Even if true, it’s not a crime to communicate with Wikileaks.


19 posted on 11/01/2018 3:59:32 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson