Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne

Why would he?


5 posted on 11/08/2018 9:48:14 AM PST by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tennmountainman

When Dems said they thought Whitaker should recuse himself it sounded like a bad joke. Why would he, as you said.

And can you imagine the megatonnage of the temper blast from Trump if someone told him “Oh, Mr. President, Matt Whitaker just recused himself. Heard it on CNN.”
They would compare it to the first or second Hiroshima and Nagasaki blasts. No windows left in White House.


21 posted on 11/08/2018 10:01:12 AM PST by frank ballenger ("End vote fraud,noncitizens & illegals voting & leftist media news censorship or we're finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: tennmountainman

“Why would he?”

I think the next move by the rats is to take this to a court and claim that because the AG recused himself, the new AG should follow the protocol and also recuse himself. I think an appeals court would agree and SCOTUS will overturn it.

Question is, would a court slap an injunction on the new AG from moving forward with getting involved in the probe?


32 posted on 11/08/2018 10:16:13 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (EVERYONE IS UNIQUE! JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: tennmountainman

Why would he?


Exactly. He’s not under investigation.


34 posted on 11/08/2018 10:18:44 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson