[marktwain]

The First Circuit has ruled that there is no right to bear arms outside of the home.

[FlingWingFlyer]

I knew this was going to happen once they legalized marijuana and people moved on to opioids.

[Celerity]

Did NH still require that people open carry ?>

[FlingWingFlyer]

If some freeloading ***hole in Honduras has the constitutional right to come into my home and demand cash, food, housing, education and healthcare, I have the contitutional right to keep and bear arms anywhere I want. PERIOD.

[G Larry]

Ya, and the Third Reich ruled there was no freedom of religion outside of Church.....

[bert]

The right to bear arms is not limited to any place.

Current limitations are customary

[FlingWingFlyer]

Since opinions are like. . ., everybody has one. This decision is valid only in the court where these three . . . keep their opinions.

[gundog]

But,....but....the Second Amendment is about hunting, right? You can’t hunt in your home. /s

[lurk]

Limited to household carry?

Sounds just a bit like infringement.

[vigilence]

Makes sense (not), we’re never in any danger except when we’re in our homes. How can anybody seriously make that arguement let alone convince a panel of judges?

[metmom]

The plaintiffs say that the Massachusetts firearms licensing statute, as implemented in Boston and Brookline, violates the Second Amendment. The district court disagreed, and so do we. Mindful that “the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited,”

Since it didn't put limits on it when it was written, then yes, it is unlimited.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

*Shall not be infringed* means, NO LIMITS.

[eyeamok]

NOTHING prevents the lame duck Congress which is still controlled by the Republicans for Impeaching and Removing these Judges and passing a LAW cementing in stone the Right to Carry ANYWHERE!!

[Tenacious 1]

we hold that the challenged regime bears a substantial relationship to important governmental interests in promoting public safety and crime prevention without offending the plaintiffs' Second Amendment rights

In other words, "Regardless of what the Constitution says."