I'm pretty sure that the military occupiers of Boston considered Adams, Revere, Hancock, Washington, and Jefferson to be criminals and a danger to the public. The whole point of the Second Amendment is to take out of the government's hands the ability to disarm the public.
Why would a person support taking firearms away from a person due to their misbehavior and yet trust them with a three-thousand pound car? The infringement of MY rights should not be justified by the behavior of others. If an adult person cannot be trusted with firearms then they cannot be trusted with liberty at all.
There are far too many who cannot be trusted with Liberty. Look at the elections.
Before anyone can drive a car, they have been tested by the states and have passed those tests.
The right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited or universally valid. I don’t think MS-13 has any right to bear arms nor the scum shooting up the ghettos.