Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

It’s strange that a court of law would insist an illegal program for illegal aliens started illegally by an illegal President would have to be continued.

DACA has NO legal basis.


20 posted on 11/08/2018 6:49:03 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurkinanloomin

It seems to me that they did not rule on the substance of what Trump did, but rather upon the procedures utilize. Of course, they were looking for something to hang their hats on because they opposed Trump but this is much more about procedure than anything else. The courts at all levels decide and enormous amount of cases based on whether procedure was properly followed or not. If one i isn’t dotted, then the procedure wasn’t followed and the action in question is overruled.

All that needs to happen here, based on the little snippet of the article above, is that the Trump Administration has to make a discretionary decision to end DACA. That shouldn’t be too hard.


22 posted on 11/08/2018 7:15:43 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson