Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VTenigma

I understand. The statute is not the governing law here. The U.S. Constitution is. That provision of the Federal Vacancy Act is almost certainly unconstitutional by any measure.


128 posted on 11/09/2018 6:05:19 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Sod off, swampy. Unless you can show me where you’ve been foaming at the mouth over it when Dems used it.


140 posted on 11/09/2018 6:17:34 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

The statue stands. Fight that battle your own way. At least Trump used legal means instead of usurping the law as his predecessor did. There are infinitely bigger unconstitutional issues to deal with that a successor statute that proscribes a mandatory sunset for an interim appointment.

Your energy may be better spent railing against “birthright citizenship” than an infinitely minuscule self correcting issue. While I wholeheartedly agree we should not allow unconstitutional statutes go unchallenged, my philosophy requires me to approach large issues first and many times the small one are taken care of in the matter of that course.


141 posted on 11/09/2018 6:19:42 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson