Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gillibrand breaks campaign vow about 2020 less than 48 hours after election
Hotair.com ^ | November 9, 2018 | JAZZ SHAW

Posted on 11/09/2018 5:57:04 PM PST by Kaslin

It will come as no surprise to regular observers of New York politics that Senator Kirsten Gillibrand handily won another term on Tuesday with roughly two-thirds of the vote. (There was some ticket splitting going on because she bagged roughly 400K more votes than Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo managed in his victory.) Having put that simple chore behind her, Gillibrand wasted no time getting booked for Stephen Colbert’s show. The host asked her the obvious question concerning her plans for 2020 and received an equally predictable answer. She’s giving it, “a long, hard thought of consideration.” (New York Times)

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand on Thursday gave her strongest public indication yet that she was contemplating a run for president in 2020, telling the late-night show host Stephen Colbert she would “give it a long, hard thought of consideration.”

“I’ve seen the hatred and the division that President Trump has put out into our country, and it has called me to fight as hard as I possibly can to restore the moral compass of this country,” Ms. Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, said in what sounded like the makings of a campaign theme.

Ms. Gillibrand, who won re-election to her second full term on Tuesday, had for months brushed aside questions about her 2020 ambitions by saying she was focused fully on 2018.

If all you read of that New York Times article was the title and first few paragraphs, you’d likely assume this was nothing out of the ordinary. Notice how the Times characterizes her past comments on the subject by saying she, “had for months brushed aside questions about her 2020 ambitions by saying she was focused fully on 2018.”

Of course, anyone who has been following this story knows that’s a complete lie. But the Times does, to their credit, mention her promise made during a debate, though you have to dig down quite a few paragraphs to find it. If you’ve been keeping up with this story here, you already know Senator Gillibrand was asked about her 2020 plans and whether or not she would serve out her full six-year term if re-elected. In fact, she was asked twice. She looked straight into the camera and gave her answer.

Moderator:Can you tell New Yorkers, who plan to vote for you on November 6, that you will, if re-elected, serve out your six-year Senate term?”

Gillibrand:I will.”

Moderator:Just want to make this clear, you’re saying that you will not get out of the race and you will not run for president? You will serve your six years?”

Gillibrand:I will serve my six-year term.”

Of course, it was only one day later when she began giving hints that she might not be keeping to that pledge, but nothing definite was announced, nor was the conflict between her statements explained.

But last night on Colbert, Gillibrand made things crystal clear. If she had no intention of even possibly running and keeping her word, that would have been an easy question to field. All she’d have to say was that she was going to be sticking with her job in the Senate, continuing to work in the best interests of the people of New York in that capacity and any other cheerful word salad she cared to dish out on top of it.

But she didn’t. Kirsten Gillibrand once again demonstrated that her promises all have an expiration date which arrives precisely as soon as they are no longer convenient. But that shouldn’t shock anyone. Go back and re-read some of her history, which I wrote about at the end of this article. Not that long ago, Gillibrand was a “conservative Democrat” who took positions and made promises which horrified Maureen Dowd and the Daily Beast. She was described by one ardent liberal author as being, “a bizarro version of Sarah Palin.” But once she was elevated to a statewide office and more progressive positions were called for, her promises melted away like cotton candy in the rain. For some deeper history, here’s a piece I wrote more than five years ago about her political “evolution,” including how she used to brag about her A rating with the NRA and keeping shotguns under her bed.

Gillibrand is a serial liar and is one of the biggest phonies out there. And now she’s giving “a long, hard thought of consideration” to running for president. I wonder which face she’ll be wearing this time if she does.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: democrats; fronthole; frontholegillibrand; gillibrand; kirstengillibrand; newyork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2018 5:57:04 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good luck with that Kristen. I’m sure all the men in America will be rushing to vote for you.


2 posted on 11/09/2018 6:00:11 PM PST by dandiegirl (BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gillibrand is a snake. She should be kept as far away from power as possible. As a congress critter she portrayed her self as pro sportsman/pro gun. The moment she no longer needed the con, she dropped it and morphed into Schumer. She lies, she panders, she can’t keep word. Yet the NY republicans let her, Schumer and Cuomo walk all over them.


3 posted on 11/09/2018 6:04:47 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

There is a big difference between running and winning.

She will serve out her 6-year term.


4 posted on 11/09/2018 6:07:37 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The are elites. They do stuff like this because they think we are dumb.


5 posted on 11/09/2018 6:08:56 PM PST by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But no Democrat senators like her at all. She killed herself after Franken.


6 posted on 11/09/2018 6:10:41 PM PST by leaning conservative (snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

She’s a Democrat, integrity is not expected.


7 posted on 11/09/2018 6:11:55 PM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

men wont vote for her.

openly liberal women are every mans ex-wives. no man votes for a man hating, money grubbing, ungrateful twofaced b1tch.


8 posted on 11/09/2018 6:39:58 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl
Kirsten Gillibrand is Christine Blasey Ford's vocal twin.

The debates will be an assault to the ears.

9 posted on 11/09/2018 6:44:41 PM PST by CaptainK ('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
"There is a big difference between running and winning. She will serve out her 6-year term."

And there is often a big difference in expectations & reality. She may resign from the Senate, thinking she will run for president.

10 posted on 11/09/2018 6:53:01 PM PST by HangThemHigh (Entropy is not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy
Gillibrand is a snake.

Yes, she is.

11 posted on 11/09/2018 6:57:14 PM PST by sauropod (Yield to sin, and experience chastening and sorrow; yield to God, and experience joy and blessing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Who can blame her? She’s probably already losing her mind, knowing that she’s now facing the prospect of serving at least six consecutive years (2015 through 2020) in the minority party of the U.S. Senate. You have to be a special kind of loser to actually WANT to do that.


12 posted on 11/09/2018 7:25:27 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

Just another lying DemoKKKrat front hole, who probably serviced Rapin Bill for his endorsement.


13 posted on 11/09/2018 8:48:32 PM PST by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

She savored the question as much as she savored the mouthful of Rapin Bill’s man essence when she was “performing” for his political endorsement.


14 posted on 11/09/2018 8:51:36 PM PST by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Soyboys will vote for her...


15 posted on 11/09/2018 8:54:10 PM PST by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

They arent men.


16 posted on 11/09/2018 8:54:51 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
RATS lie... it's what they do!!
17 posted on 11/09/2018 9:29:11 PM PST by Chode ( We’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

She is a liar and by looks of it President Trump is making her fat also.


18 posted on 11/09/2018 10:01:10 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Yes.The last Democrat Senator with integrity was Joe Lieberman


19 posted on 11/09/2018 10:11:50 PM PST by BigEdLB (BigEdLB, Russian BOT, At your service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

She is the walking poster-girl for repeal of the 17th Amendment.

Think state legislators put up with this kind of double cross for more than one term?


20 posted on 11/10/2018 2:49:33 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson