Probably not much chance for an armed citizen to put a stop to one of these attacks huh? Yeah, I didn't think so.
1 posted on
11/10/2018 11:06:14 AM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
2 posted on
11/10/2018 11:07:07 AM PST by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
Tear down the mosques. Boot out the Muslims.
There is no reason for them to be there in the first place.
3 posted on
11/10/2018 11:11:41 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: rktman
But, we can follow the progressive train of thought regarding bad things.
If food is considered dangerous, just ban food.
Works with guns all the time. /s
4 posted on
11/10/2018 11:11:43 AM PST by
Da Coyote
To: rktman
I’m trying to figure out why they are mad at Australia? UN actions? Sanctions? Local terrorism or anti-islam laws?
I haven’t heard much from down under, would you happen to know?
To: naturalman1975
Would love to get your take on this.
8 posted on
11/10/2018 11:34:07 AM PST by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: rktman
The attacker, who was shot by police and died at the hospital, reportedly was known to intelligence authorities. He was known? So why did they sit on their hands until he killed people?
Ah yes: taking preemptive action against terrorists of a certain persuasion is now a "hate crime"
So we can "virtue signal" even as we bury our dead.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson