Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trump.Deplorable

Wouldnt they have to have a recount before they have a runoff?


20 posted on 11/10/2018 3:53:40 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Liz

I don’t know what the law is in Georgia but Abrams is trying to get a runoff election, since she won’t be able to manufacture the votes needed.

That is her goal here.


23 posted on 11/10/2018 3:55:45 PM PST by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Wouldnt they have to have a recount before they have a runoff?

A recount would be triggered at a lower threshold than a runoff, but not by much. 1% difference for a recount, less than 50% for Kemp for a runoff. Their plan is to get it to a recount where they can work the margin to a runoff.

Currently, Kemp is 50.28% and Abrams is 48.78%. Yesterday Kemp was 50.33%. But there simply aren't any more votes, and if Abrams really wants every vote counted, the uncounted votes now probably favor Kemp more than Abrams. There is a large amount of provisional ballots, but people who cast them had to bring supporting evidence of their registration or ID or whatever caused them to have to cast a provisional ballot by Friday night. That time has passed and the votes garnered by Abrams is likely the reason why Kemp's lead slightly diminished.

This is over, and hopefully Tuesday night Abrams will concede and Kemp will celebrate.

48 posted on 11/11/2018 6:26:54 AM PST by Religion and Politics (It is time for more than one denomination of "Political Correctness".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson