Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zanarchist

This was hinted at in the 1980s when they started buying natural gas (France and Germany). It got brought up again in the 1990s. Under Bush, it was discussed again.

Other than keeping some US forces in the UK (after BREXIT) and maybe holding some deal with the Italians for the naval port...there is nothing left to really spend US funding on bases in Europe.

Hanson is correct...five members of NATO can cover the 2-percent requirement. The rest can’t. I don’t see a problem in removing troops and just having some massive exercise every two years to show US mobility functions as advertised.


14 posted on 11/13/2018 3:53:08 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

It’s not can’t.

It’s won’t.

And the won’t is why the US should leave a vapor trail exiting NATO.


16 posted on 11/13/2018 4:08:16 AM PST by mewzilla (Is Central America emptying its prisons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson