Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Izzy Dunne

Actually, horse pucky to your horse pucky.

The conditioning being spoken of is NOT the “science” but the propagation of ideas that are useful for ends entirely apart from the science.

This is about education, not of scientists but of the citizenry.

Or, as I long ago pondered, is it really the case that bad textbooks are cheaper than good that on this subject matter they invariably contain old ideas that were frequently considered quaint or outdated before those textbooks were written?

The need for the secularists isn’t for people to understand the science but to believe the proposition, and not so that they should become scientist but so they should become secularists.


10 posted on 11/13/2018 12:02:56 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Rurudyne
The need for the secularists isn’t for people to understand the science but to believe the proposition, and not so that they should become scientist but so they should become secularists.

I add: their need is also for people whose will is set against thinking because it is too hard.

12 posted on 11/13/2018 12:32:13 PM PST by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson