Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

There is no reason that DOJ rules of succession would take precedence over Congressional legislation creating actual, legislated, rules of succession.


75 posted on 11/14/2018 9:17:22 AM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant
There is no reason that DOJ rules of succession would take precedence over Congressional legislation creating actual, legislated, rules of succession.

That's a valid point, and I've said many times that the DOJ rules of succession are arbitrary in nature and subject to change at the discretion of the President anyway (he's done it twice since he was inaugurated in January 2017). But there are no "rules of succession" created by Congress in this case. The Federal Vacancies act outlines temporary appointments the President MAY make -- which clearly indicates that he is also free to leave offices vacant if he wishes.

Also -- Keep in mind that the conflict between the Federal Vacancies Act and the U.S. Constitution only exists for "principal officers" under the Appointments Clause. If Whitaker had been appointed to a post like acting Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, this wouldn't even be an issue.

78 posted on 11/14/2018 9:24:30 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson