How about NO or you and what army, Judge. Or, as an alternative, no more press conferences?
“...How about NO or you and what army, Judge....”
Exactly. Try to enforce it.
How about NO or you and what army, Judge. Or, as an alternative, no more press conferences?
—
This frigging asshole should be impeached... tomorrow.
How DARE he undercut the authority of the President to dismiss someone who’s being rude and repeatedly refusing to turn over the mike as a press conference?
What’s next - are we supposed to let those screeching feminist harpies scream until their teeny little hearts are content at Congress because, you know, it’s their “right”?
Maybe we should all gather outside the frigging asshole judge’s house and scream rude questions at HIM and refuse to be removed... it’s our “free speech” right, isn’t it?
It’s just so SAD to see this country circling the toilet - and it’s even more sad that President Trump has evidently just capitulated to this garbage “ruling” (because it’s clear, by his reaction, that he has no intention of calling off press briefings because of this). What if he has a press briefing and doesn’t call on Acosta? Does Acosta also have the “right” to ask questions? If so, doesn’t EVERY reporter for EVERY outlet? Because, you know you can’t keep ANY of the out, now, right?
I vote for:
1. Litigating this nonsense to the Supreme Court, if necessary. The US Constitution does not give our Judicial Branch the power to control who is admitted to the White House.
2. Holding no more press conferences. Using “Twitter” and “fire-side chats” instead.
3. Giving one-on-one interviews to non-US reporters and other “serious” (real) journalists.
4. Fumigating and redecorating the “offices” now used by the White House Press Corps.
5. While the redecoration is proceeding, creating a new “press corps briefing room” that is not in the White House and that has no special seats for the self-selected “elite reporters”.