C'mon you guys. The fraud was all over FR and in the news. McSally was AHEAD on election night. Then as usual, the late ballots and other shenanigans started coming in.
“Ahead on Election Night” is a meaningless statistic, like saying “but the Giants were ahead after the 3rd quarter, so how could they lose”.
75% of the Arizona voters were vote-by-mail, and they had to verify signatures, and still had about 600,000 uncounted ballots after election night.
True. But doesn't change the fact that it was close enough for the RATs to steal it. The race should NOT have been close in the first place. She was running in normally safe GOP Arizona against an openly leftist loon.
She might have narrowly been ahead on election night, but she is a weak candidate. If a Dem candidate BARELY had more votes than an unapologetic conservative Republican candidate running in heavily DemocRAT San Francisco, do you think the Dems would want to promote that candidate for another race?