Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zanarchist

I respectfully disagree. Today it’s “the feds need to protect possible victims of genital mutilations.” Tomorrow it’s “the feds need to protect possible victims of gun violence.” No thanks.


50 posted on 11/21/2018 5:25:44 AM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: thefactor

Lemme guess: you’re a man.


52 posted on 11/21/2018 5:33:56 AM PST by zanarchist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: thefactor

That is the hard part of conservatism.

Stepping back from your emotions and taking a rational, long-term view of the path that “the government should do something about this outrage (of the moment)” will take.

Is this (FGM) wrong? You bet. Is it the purview of the federal government, and could the approach to cure it at a federal level be misused?


54 posted on 11/21/2018 5:38:33 AM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: thefactor

The victims are minors.


56 posted on 11/21/2018 5:47:02 AM PST by zanarchist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: thefactor

False equivalence. It’s also a presumption that FGM is “free exercise of religion”, which it is not.


81 posted on 11/21/2018 10:25:12 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson