Let's Wrap This FReepathon Up, Folks!
I agree; despite Mark’s opposition to Pres. Trump during the primary season he’s been pretty fair and supportive since then. TBH I voted for Cruz in the primary but had no choice but to vote MAGA in the general.
Not to mention that the President’s various travel/entry bans are fully and firmly ensconced in the US Code. Prior decisions have held that the President acts at the fullest within his powers wham Congress has passed a law allowing the particular action.
I guess these activist bench-occupiers expect the President to break the law like they do. Or allowed the Pretender to do.
One could make a case that ignoring the Constitution and established law hardly falls in the category of “good behavior”, and these bench-occupiers are and should be subject to impeachment.
Roberts knows President Trump told the truth. But, honor among thieves . . .
There are Obama judges and then there are Bush judges, and often they are indistinguishable in their unconstitutional legislative grabs.
John Roberts is the one that screwed America over by allowing Obamacare to remain the law of the land..so Roberts deserve all the criticism he gets
Great comments by Mark.
Let's Wrap This FReepathon Up, Folks!
Just something about these two. Where they separated at birth?
Roberts criticism was classless.
JoMa
A point made on tonight’s Fox News:
75 percent of the 9th Circuit’s decisions are OVERTURNED.
Roberts is signalling he is going to oppose Trump’s MAGA agenda. The 2020 election season has begun.
Here’s the thing about Trump. If we’re thinking it, he will eventually utter it.
John Roberts ruled like he did on obamacare because he was blackmailed by things which surfaced by using intelligence assets against him.
John Roberts doesn’t live in the real world
BUMP!
HOORAY Mark1
Roberts appears to be another GWB mistake.
“he should be admonishing his own branch of government for its outrageous activism “
Indeed!
I don't doubt the Chief Justice really believes this but I would argue that the job of a Judge is not to do equal right to those appearing before them. There job is to apply the law or the constitution as it is written, not as the Judge thinks it should have been written. When a Judge substitutes his concept of what is right for what is prescribed by law, he forfeits his legitimacy. I agree with the President that far too many courts are presided over by advocates rather than Judges.
They like to attack the President for some of his remarks, however a Supreme Court Justice criticizing the President is way out of line and certainly not objective or judicial.
If Roberts thinks we have a dedicated doing their best, he doesn’t live in this world. If what we have is “doing their best”, well, it isn’t good enough. In fact, many are doing a piss poor job and should be fired.
Is he still being controlled by that adoption thing? It’s not exactly in the closet anymore and nobody cares anyway.