Posted on 11/23/2018 10:38:08 AM PST by Liberty7732
Although I am not a lawyer and do not play one on TV, it would seem that the judge could be ignored and a declaration issued that he had no standing to make such a ruling.
That argument would then need to be litigated and carried through the system to the supreme court. It the SCOTUS ruled for the President, the lower judgement would be rendered moot.
The Judiciary has decided to “impeach in place” by declaring everything PDJT does to be unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court should have exclusive original jurisdiction over challenges to Presidential orders. They can decline a frivolous challenge by refusing to hear the case. Even if they take a case, if the President in his judgment and discretion doesn’t agree with the Supremes decision in such matters (if they choose to take the case at all), then he has the power under the Constitution to ignore them.
Let 'em figure it out on their own.
Better yet, just impose martial law along the entire border, then ignore the stay. I think, however, Roberts is giving off signals that he is going to be the new RBG. I think whatever the left is using to blackmail Roberts, Trump ought to use to force him to resign.
>>I think whatever the left is using to blackmail Roberts, Trump ought to use to force him to resign.
***********************************************************
And he better do it quickly. Traitor Roberts stands poised with the last coffin nail.
How many more unconstitutional acts of treason do we need?
These activist judges must be eliminated.
This.
The President is responding to these rulings as though he is a citizen rather than a separate INDEPENDENT branch of the government. The Constitution gives the executive branch the authority to deal with illegal immigration and the judicial branch has none. Let this ignorant judge bring his case before the U.S. Supreme Court if he thinks he can win it. In the mean time, enforce President Trumps orders.
I remember when we had the Gore election re-count (Florida), somebody was able to get that case before the Supreme Court ASAP and now. How did they do it? Why can’t we get this before the Supreme Court NOW???
Well, I’ve sort of lost track of events. Is the President abiding by the injunction or ignoring it?
Or possibly sidestepping
Here’s an idea. Ignore the judge.
If it were me, after the most recent SCOTUS decision would tell Tigre to go pound sand.
But that’s just me.
5.56mm
+1
SCJ Roberts will be the wild card if this gets to the Supreme Court in a month or two. BUT if Justice GinzzBorg is still sidelined then puke Roberts becomes less dangerous. Unless he votes with the three remaining libs on the Supreme court, making a 4-4 tie, thus letting the 9th’s decision on asylum stand.
I would think Roberts would have had to rule against the last SC decision the presidents powers to take a contrary position on this case.
Does anyone know if I am correct....
“The President must then rapidly proceed to the Supreme Court where this case will undoubtedly be overruled.”
To do so keeps it within the court where of course it should be, BUT due historically rampant abuse of the Constitution by the Judicial, the Executive, and lack of initiative to correct the abuse by the Legislative I wonder if it should be. Perhaps PDJT should simply ignore the errant Judge, but then..............
Follow the chain of command is the safe way, but the Judge is wrong.
What a shame that you are so disappointed in President Trump, bless your little heart.
It actually went to the Florida Supreme Court First...but got to the USSC because it was a Federal Election.
Tigar was born in London, England in 1962!
We need to amend the Constitution to disallow foreign-born individuals from being Federal Judges.
This "Judge" Tigar is doubtlessly ruling as if he were representing the United Nations' approach to immigration as being an authority greater than the President of the United Dates and his Executive Branch.
Tigar is acting as if he is one of the coterie of rulers extensively discussed by Judge Robert H. Bork in his book "Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges" (see comments) that condemns the use of the bench by activist judges whose intent is to subvert and suborn the democratic legislative process on a global scale.
Brief Amazon review of the "Coercing Virtue" content:
"It may not reach the best-seller lists, as the much bigger Slouching towards Gomorrah (1996) did, but this concentrated and cogent statement on the preeminent object of his concern--the state of the judiciary--may be Bork's most important book for nonspecialist readers. Throughout the world, Bork says, judges rather than legislators are making and repealing laws, and internationalizing law as they do. Getting to particulars, he discusses the U.S., Canadian, and Israeli supreme courts, adducing evidence of each deciding cases partisanly and ideologically rather than according to the letter and documented intent of constitutional law. Such judicial subjectiveness begins early--Marbury v. Madison (1803), which established the practice of judicial review, brazenly favored Chief Justice Marshall's Federalist Party against President Jefferson's Democratic Republican administration--but reaches its present peak in the Israeli court's self-appointment of new members and assumption that all behavior of whatever kind falls within its purview, regardless of whether any suits have been filed. Of course, what Bork finds alarming, others hail as liberating. Fine argument, though." Ray OlsonThis is what should be classed as a "high crime"--that of treason--worthy of a death sentence delivered by those invoking the impeachment of such a high-handed judge, IMHO.
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
>>This is what should be classed as a “high crime”—that of treason—worthy of a death sentence delivered by those invoking the impeachment of such a high-handed judge, IMHO.
************************************************************
Amen, and if it’s not soon classed as such, it’s sayonara, U.S.A.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.