Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen

Why is he asking a civilian court to rule on what seems to me to be a military domain?


5 posted on 11/23/2018 2:36:45 PM PST by Kalamata (How to interpret The Revelation: http://bibleresearchtools.com/bible-study-video-series/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kalamata

Roberts will rule its unconstitutional to preclude men that think their women and women that think their men from the Armed Forces. The reason is simple, in all likelihood he’s a homosexual and his lesbian cousin said he would always make her happy on the court. She was exactly right.

He dissented in the Obergefell v. Hodges case in which Kennedy wrote for the majority, again 5-4, that same-sex couples had a right to marry.[73] In Pavan v. Smith, the Supreme Court “summarily overruled” the Arkansas Supreme Court’s decision that the state did not have to list same-sex spouses on birth certificates thus siding with same-sex couples who filed the lawsuit; Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented but Roberts did not join their dissent leaving open speculation that he ruled with the majority.[74]


7 posted on 11/23/2018 2:50:19 PM PST by NKP_Vet ("Man without God descends into madness”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson