Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/28/2018 9:51:55 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Seizethecarp

stone left the Trump campaign in early 2016, long before this alleged event occurred. Correct?


2 posted on 11/28/2018 9:54:40 AM PST by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Russia Russia Russia


3 posted on 11/28/2018 9:55:15 AM PST by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

So opposition research is a crime now. Because Hillary.


4 posted on 11/28/2018 9:55:36 AM PST by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
Mohamed faces a possible maximum sentence of eight years and eight months in state prison if convicted as charged.

So what?

5 posted on 11/28/2018 9:57:10 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt; LucyT; null and void; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Flotsam_Jetsome; circumbendibus; ...

Ping to Dr. Corsi getting into more trouble with Mueller! Hope POTUS Trump can pardon him.

NYT reporters are really excited about this and seem to think Stone is implicated, but Stone has a good comeback:

Begin quote in the article:

“Mr. Stone said on his website that Mr. Corsi was confused about what took place. “Jerry is simply mistaken that what we discussed was a cover. Ask yourself, ‘a cover for what?’” he wrote. “In August 2016, there was no investigation, no special counsel, no congressional committees and no subpoenas, why would a story be necessary?”

End quote


6 posted on 11/28/2018 9:57:15 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

#1. BFD.

#2. Why should I believe “an associate”.

#3. Why should I believe the NY Slimes?


7 posted on 11/28/2018 10:01:47 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

The real question here is who on the special counsel’s staff is Maggie Halberman sleeping with? Her name repeatedly appears on thes special counsel leaks


8 posted on 11/28/2018 10:02:08 AM PST by Cold War Veteran - Submarines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Take out the words....”Word Is”...and you might have something. But does it even matter.


9 posted on 11/28/2018 10:02:23 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

He said prosecutors are especially interested in an email he sent to Mr. Stone on Aug. 2, 2016:

Julian Assange: ‘A lot more material’ coming on US elections
By Matthew Chance, CNN

Updated 3:32 AM ET, Wed July 27, 2016

https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/26/politics/julian-assange-dnc-email-leak-hack/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3453327/posts?page=56

(CNN)Wikileaks founder Julian Assange said Tuesday his whistleblowing website might release “a lot more material” relevant to the US electoral campaign.

Assange was speaking in a CNN interview following the release of nearly 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee by suspected Russian hackers.


10 posted on 11/28/2018 10:03:36 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

The Democrats and Mueller seem to be defining the seeking of information by Republicans as a crime. Curious. For electoral fairness it is legally required that Republicans remain ignorant?


13 posted on 11/28/2018 10:11:11 AM PST by arthurus (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

This is their response to Corsi saying “No” to MuleFace. They can’t abide by men standing up against them. It infuriates them. They want to crush everyone they can. They may or may not be lying. Probably lying.


15 posted on 11/28/2018 10:12:43 AM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Corsi’s side of the story is both more interesting and more verifiable.


17 posted on 11/28/2018 10:21:04 AM PST by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

More Maggie Haberman trash. Please lock them all up. I’m done with this sideshow.


18 posted on 11/28/2018 10:32:30 AM PST by larryleo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Did they find out who murdered Seth Rich yet? I’m sure the NY Times has a fleet of reporters working on it. Once again, enough is enough. Start handing out the indictments. Everyone in the media involved and Obama and his minions all need to pay the piper. The game is over.


21 posted on 11/28/2018 10:35:33 AM PST by larryleo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

So? Looking for damaging information regarding your Political Opponent is now Illegal?

Who paid for the pissing on the Bed story again?


23 posted on 11/28/2018 10:35:56 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Stone wanted dirt on Clinton and thought he could get it from Wikileaks.

So What! Even if it’s true, it’s no different than going to the NY Times and getting dirt on Trump.

Wikileaks is a NEWS operation. They do investigative journalism.


25 posted on 11/28/2018 10:45:00 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

How is it a crime to find out what Wikileaks had? Stone didn’t hack the emails or give the emails to Assange. All he did was reach out to find out what they had. How is that collusion? If the NYT reached out to find out what Wikileaks had, that wouldn’t be a crime.


26 posted on 11/28/2018 10:45:03 AM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Seriously, this is what Mueller thinks is Russian collusion? The campaign “interested” in what WikiLeaks might leak?


30 posted on 11/28/2018 12:01:46 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

And Hillary Clinton and the DNC used a money laundering law firm to work with MI-6 and the US Intelligence agencies to manufacture false opposition research and use it as the basis of criminal investigations.

So who is the criminal? Lock her Up!


33 posted on 11/28/2018 12:24:19 PM PST by Robert357 ( Dan Rather was discharged as "medically unfit" on May 11, 1954.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Who did Hillary dspatch to collude with the Brits to dig, er, fabricate dirt on Trump?


36 posted on 11/28/2018 12:31:48 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson