Skip to comments.
Report: President Trump Signing Bump Stock Ban, Citizens Have 90 Days to Turn Them In
BREITBART ^
| 29 November 2018
| Awr Hawkins
Posted on 11/29/2018 8:41:27 AM PST by skimbell
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161 next last
To: Jewbacca
Theyve already obtained the credit card orders and the like from the manufacturers/sellers. So they have a list. Not evidence. Only registration would hold up legally.
61
posted on
11/29/2018 9:29:25 AM PST
by
fwdude
(Forget the Catechism, the RCC's real doctrine is what they allow with impunity.)
To: skimbell
Personally, I don’t see any functional difference between a bump stock and an unregistered drop in auto sear. They both are modifications to a firearm that allow full auto fire. As a side note, at least when the ATF determined that the streetsweeper shotgun was a destructive device, you could still possess one if you registered it as a DD. Also the normal NFA $200 registration (tax) fee was not required.
62
posted on
11/29/2018 9:30:52 AM PST
by
bruoz
To: skimbell
Bad move by Trump, but Hillary would have done this in her first week as POTUS.
63
posted on
11/29/2018 9:32:42 AM PST
by
fwdude
(Forget the Catechism, the RCC's real doctrine is what they allow with impunity.)
To: kenmcg
He should have gotten a compromise, such as allowing licensed holders permission to carry interstate, etc. Ha! I like the way you think.
64
posted on
11/29/2018 9:33:57 AM PST
by
fwdude
(Forget the Catechism, the RCC's real doctrine is what they allow with impunity.)
To: skimbell
Bump stocks are just an inefficient way to pretend to have a select fire weapon, and we should still be able to own real select fire weapons without all the bureaucracy and expense. Bump stocks are a poor substitute. I’m old enough to remember being able to order guns by mailorder. But I agree this is a bad precedent. This is probably just a trial balloon to see what the reaction will be. If you don’t like it, let the WH and your congresscritters know.
65
posted on
11/29/2018 9:34:41 AM PST
by
afsnco
(18 of 20 in AF JAG)
To: Sacajaweau
No need for them I don't see the word "need" in the Second Amendment.
Common sense.
Pound sand, Chuck Schumer.
66
posted on
11/29/2018 9:36:20 AM PST
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: skimbell
That won’t make America great again
67
posted on
11/29/2018 9:38:23 AM PST
by
mrmeyer
(You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
To: Jewbacca
What happens if you lost or threw yours away?These were not tracked as to who bought them. They have no way to know who owns one, unless on-line and local retailers give up purchase information where credit/debit cards were used. Those who paid cash cannot be tracked.
68
posted on
11/29/2018 9:39:15 AM PST
by
IYAS9YAS
(There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
To: fwdude
Surely bump stocks arent registered, are they?Nope. I have an acquaintance who has one, and he paid cash. So no credit/debit card or on-line purchase data to show up anywhere.
69
posted on
11/29/2018 9:41:04 AM PST
by
IYAS9YAS
(There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
To: skimbell
70
posted on
11/29/2018 9:41:26 AM PST
by
karnage
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And your blue jeans, or wear them without any pockets.
To: skimbell
Just wondering what a class III license costs. If you want full auto, pay for it.
To: skimbell
“I don’t care one bit about bump stocks, but I’m probably irrevokeable upset with Trump and his “just doing the work obama couldn’t do” chit.”
Now all the liberals will vote for him! I support Trump, but this was extremely bone headed.
73
posted on
11/29/2018 9:49:12 AM PST
by
suthener
(E)
To: skimbell
Basically bump stocks are a legally indefensible POS. When you let legislators make the decision, you wind up with all sorts of crap like banning all firearm sales to persons 18-20 years of age. That's what happened in Florida with a large Republican majority in the House and Senate and a Repub governor.
74
posted on
11/29/2018 9:49:29 AM PST
by
bruoz
To: Sacajaweau
Just do it. No need for them. Common sense.
/sarc
To: Sacajaweau
“Just do it. No need for them. Common sense.”
Yep, common sense. AR 15 style rifles? Get rid of them. Just common sense. Semi auto firearms? Get rid of them. Common sense. All guns? Get rid of them. Common sense.
76
posted on
11/29/2018 9:51:11 AM PST
by
suthener
(E)
To: skimbell
Basically bump stocks are a legally indefensible POS. When you let legislators make the decision, you wind up with all sorts of crap like banning all firearm sales to persons 18-20 years of age. That's what happened in Florida with a large Republican majority in the House and Senate and a Repub governor.
77
posted on
11/29/2018 9:53:16 AM PST
by
bruoz
To: bruoz
“Personally, I dont see any functional difference between a bump stock and an unregistered drop in auto sear. They both are modifications to a firearm that allow full auto fire. As a side note, at least when the ATF determined that the streetsweeper shotgun was a destructive device, you could still possess one if you registered it as a DD. Also the normal NFA $200 registration (tax) fee was not required.”
Have you ever read the law? What part of it defines a bump stock? That’s pretty important to knowing what you’re talking about.
78
posted on
11/29/2018 9:54:14 AM PST
by
suthener
(E)
To: GuavaCheesePuff
I don’t use drugs but i agree with you. Too much court time wasted on pot. If you have done your time why can’t a felon released vote. And you can’t get a job even as a barber as it requires a license.
79
posted on
11/29/2018 9:54:49 AM PST
by
gcparent
(Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
To: skimbell
Since before the National Firearms Act of 1934 -- the problem isn't ever the guns, it's the people.
PC Principle prohibits asking the question: What is WRONG with these people?" And we end up with stupid regulations like this.
80
posted on
11/29/2018 9:57:52 AM PST
by
Sooth2222
(Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson