Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/29/2018 3:37:26 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Kaslin

His kids were adopted from Ireland via somewhere in Latin America.

It’s ILLEGAL for people not residing in Ireland to adopt kids from there, see..? That’s why they did it that way, the technically illegal way. That’s why they had the two Irish mothers FLY out of Ireland, to use the Little Kid Black Market.

Roberts and his wife were vulnerable on that, that’s why they say he switched his Obamacare vote.

He was blackmailed.


2 posted on 11/29/2018 3:43:12 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Who is correct?

Trump. These anti-Constitutional "judges" need to be removed.

3 posted on 11/29/2018 3:46:23 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

IIRC, this all started when a judge in Hawaii ruled against Trump for trying to enforce the exact same immigration law Obama used — separating parents and children when the parents were detained.

That ruling finally got to the SC which sided with Trump against the Hawaii judge.


5 posted on 11/29/2018 3:47:41 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Take the deal, Roberts. This is not the hill you want to kill yourself trying to defend. Instead of spitting in Trump's eye, ask him to extend you a graceful exit. He'll help you get out of the pickle you are in, if only you are willing. Otherwise, well, bye.


6 posted on 11/29/2018 3:47:56 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Chief Justice Roberts never said a word when the OBAMSTER criticized the Supreme Court rulings because he is a coward who was and still is afraid of being called a racist.

Jumping on the opportunity of criticizing Trump had no risk and will get him much praise from the media.

All this guy cares about is appearances and his legacy or he would have stayed silent like he did with the previous POTUS.

7 posted on 11/29/2018 3:50:52 PM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The author overlooks the fact that the POTUS can deny entry of any group of persons he sees fit, the SCOTUS has already confirmed that. Trump is just exercising that power by designating central and south Americans who come across the boarder illegally as a group. And when you have tens of thousands of them crossing at once and overwhelming the system, it must be brought under control. The law was never intended to allow us to be invaded and not defend ourselves.


9 posted on 11/29/2018 3:51:43 PM PST by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

.
As usual, Town Hall blows it!


10 posted on 11/29/2018 3:51:55 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Judge Nap has a few inaccuracies. For one, Sec Def did NOT call it a stunt. Mattis specifically replied to a Reporters question asking if it was a stunt, by stating that WE DON’T DO STUNTS.

In addition, under the UN/Int’l rules the asylum seekers are supposed to ask for asylum in the first country that they enter - that would be Mexico, not USA. Some Freeper did a lot of research and posted this a few days ago.

Also, not mentioned is the fact that we are still operating in a state of emergency since 9/11 and a couple of other national emergencies which involve illicit border crossings, hence I’ll be surprised if POTUS doesn’t have the right to do this-since rules change to give POTUS more authority in emergencies, and he already has plenty in regards to who gets in and who doesn’t.

Roberts needs to shut up. If there weren’t Obama Judges and Trump/Conservative judges, we wouldn’t have had to endure high tech lynching of Thomas and Kavanaugh.


11 posted on 11/29/2018 3:52:24 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Gay Judge speaketh. But...

Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states plainly: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

ection 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act similarly states: “Unless otherwise ordered by the President, it shall be unlawful for any alien to depart from or enter or attempt to depart from or enter the United States except under such reasonable rules, regulations, and orders, and subject to such limitations and exceptions as the President may prescribe.”

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-upholding-rule-law-ensuring-consequences-illegally-cross-border/

“any aliens or of any class of aliens...impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”


12 posted on 11/29/2018 3:53:33 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonevoice

Words ae just inadequate.


13 posted on 11/29/2018 3:53:52 PM PST by Pride in the USA (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Judge” nap doesn’t quote any statutes when he says the radical leftist judge upheld US law. I’ve heard plenty of lawyers on TV quote the statutes that Trump was enforcing, and the recent SCOTUS ruling in support of that enforcement.

Also, there is the basic premise that someone seeking asylum must stop in the country (Mexico) where it is first offered.

Everyone knows this commie judge will be overturned on appeal.

I used to like judge nap sometime ago but now he’s nothing but a Trump hating butt head. Replace him with Judge Jeanine.


15 posted on 11/29/2018 3:56:37 PM PST by Ceebass (The only thing Orwell got wrong was the date)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Trial judges do not make public policy. They apply statutes as written by Congress, pursuant to precedent as set forth by the Supreme Court and the intermediate appellate court to which they are subject.

That's the theory and the job description.

But in actuality, many do overstep their charter and make, or attempt to make, public policy by stretching or reinterpreting the written word of laws and the US Constitution.

Prime example:

The judges that decided that President Trump does not have the authority to end Barack Obama's illegal DACA act.

19 posted on 11/29/2018 4:04:18 PM PST by Iron Munro (Some things are so stupid and idiotic only a liberal could believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I think we should let all those refugees with TB, lice, respiratory infections go to the Judges chambers to stay until their cases can be heard. He didn’t have any problems with them exposing Americans to those diseases so he should be fine with it.


20 posted on 11/29/2018 4:04:41 PM PST by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Trial judges do not make public policy.”

Like hell they don’t. So do appellate judges, and any other member of the magistrate class that thinks they can rule by judicial proclamation.


22 posted on 11/29/2018 4:09:00 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So obvious who owns YOU, Dandy Andy.


24 posted on 11/29/2018 4:11:15 PM PST by Kalamata (How to interpret The Revelation: http://bibleresearchtools.com/bible-study-video-series/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Justice Roberts speaks from feigned ignorance of the real world we all live in. He expresses a utopic circumstance where judges conduct their legal decisions totally divorced from human experience. It’s a nice utopic idea but totally unreal, which doesn’t say much about Roberts’ mental abilities.


38 posted on 11/29/2018 4:34:47 PM PST by iontheball (TT'S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It is about time that we had a President that stands up to the Supreme Court. We haven't had one for decades. The Supreme Court is supposed to be challenged, at time, either by the President or Congress.

If that had been done in the past we wouldn't now be dealing with some stupid and un-American decisions that have come out of that arrogant body.

45 posted on 11/29/2018 4:44:19 PM PST by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Judge Napolitano is probably wrong in attributing the word "faithfully" to Madison. Madison was behind the Virginia Plan, introduced on May 29 by Edmund Randolph, but that version has nothing about the oath of office (and doesn't make clear if the national executive is to be a single person or more). There are many differences between the Virginia Plan and the final version of the Constitution.

The report of the Committee on detail on August 6 already had the provision that the President "shall take care that the laws of the United States be duly and faithfully executed..." I don't know whether Madison was a member of this committee.

56 posted on 11/29/2018 5:11:21 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Judge Andrew Napolitano can KMA.


62 posted on 11/29/2018 5:18:39 PM PST by Gator113 ( ~~Trump 2020~~ There needs to be a quieting of the screaming lambs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

AKA, the Father of the Obamacare scam.


65 posted on 11/29/2018 5:22:42 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson