To: bitt
Are they there to grab the evidence for destruction?
3 posted on
11/30/2018 8:32:52 AM PST by
dartuser
To: dartuser
That and they’re also there to intimidate the whistleblower into silence.
4 posted on
11/30/2018 8:33:37 AM PST by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: dartuser
“Are they there to grab the evidence for destruction?”
Different potential scenario:
The data are already destroyed. The raid was not run until evidence (exculpatory for the erstwhile targets) was prepared and ready for “release.” NO ONE will see any evidence collected from the scene. It will have been destroyed, likely right there and then.
One noid is simply not enough....
.03
KYPD
22 posted on
11/30/2018 8:44:56 AM PST by
petro45acp
(All those disopian movies? applefacebookgoogletwitteryahooutoob....you are the bad guys!)
To: dartuser
37 posted on
11/30/2018 9:00:12 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: dartuser
Absolutely. Christopher Wray is pledged member of the corruption team.
73 posted on
11/30/2018 10:10:37 AM PST by
Baynative
("A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams." - John Barrymore)
To: dartuser
76 posted on
11/30/2018 10:23:04 AM PST by
sport
To: dartuser
"Isn't that Muller's name on these documents?
Shut up and keep shoveling!!!"
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson