Only the Brain Dead Buy This Climate Change Hoax

RUSH: So I’m watching CNN this morning, I have it on, all of a sudden I look up and I see Christine Todd Whitman. Christine Todd Whitman, the former Republican governor of New Jersey and quintessential Republican establishment type, RINO, if you will, right out of the McCain wing of the party. You know what she’s talking about? The need for serious climate change action.

She’s quoting from the Trump administration climate change report which, for about the gazillionth time now in the last 30 years, warns us that we only have 10 years left to address these dire circumstances or else by the end of the century, 82 years from now, we’re gonna die. We have 10 years. And if we don’t do what these people say needs to be done in 10 years, then in another 82 years, we are gonna die.

looked at that just on the surface of it. How do we even have a chance when brain-dead RINOs even fall for this stuff? And by the way, I mean brain-dead falling for it. It could well be that they’re just their own version of pro-government, leftist type activists and sign on to it just because the government says so. But I also wonder how many people on our side who buy into this stuff really just don’t know, they just accept it because they think the sources are credible?

Well, it turns out — and of course one of the selling points in this latest climate report, “Well, it came from Trump’s own administration!” And the media’s loving running around saying that Trump’s saying I just don’t believe it. “Well, what do you mean? Your own administration put out the report.” And Trump said (paraphrasing), “I didn’t put out the report. It may have come from people who work in Washington, but they’re not part of my operation. I did not put out the report. I do not believe it.”

Then they start mocking him and making fun of him as being a full-fledged idiot. And if you’re just patient, if people are just patient and we eventually will find out, “Andrew Light, who worked on the 2015 Paris accord negotiations as a senior adviser to the U.S. Special Envoy on Climate Change under Secretary of State John F. Kerry, served as a review editor for the assessment –” In other words, an Obamaite wrote this climate report in the Trump administration.

“Andrew Light, who worked on the 2015 Paris accord negotiations as a senior adviser to the U.S. Special Envoy on Climate Change under Secretary of State John F. Kerry, served as a review editor for the assessment, overseeing the pivotal final chapter that concluded under a worst-case scenario that global warming could wipe out as much as 10 percent of the U.S. economy by 2100.”

“Mr. Light also spent five years as senior fellow and director of international climate policy at the Center for American Progress, which was founded and now led by longtime Democratic insider [and phishing victim] John Podesta. The center is also financed by liberal billionaires such as Mr. Soros and Mr. Steyer.”

So this Trump administration, like any other, has career appointees. The left gets themselves appointed to these career positions, they never leave, and they serve to corrupt. Even though we have a new president from a New Party, Obamaites still populate much of Washington in the bureaucracies and in the cabinet level departments and so forth, like FDA, EPA. I mean they’re all over the place, just like the left appoints judges who are left-wing activists, not really judges, and they are there to provide election loss insurance.

And so here we basically have somebody that worked for John Kerry and this phony special envoy on climate change who had the final review of the Trump administration National Climate Assessment.

“The involvement of Mr. Light and other figures known for their climate change advocacy has raised questions about the credibility of the report, which has been widely depicted as a politically neutral, scientific document.” Yes, everything the left does is never said to be liberal. It’s never said to be socialist.

It’s always said to be nonpartisan. It’s always said to be neutral. It’s always said to be scientific, put together by disinterested specialists, just like Mueller is a disinterested, dispassionate enforcer of the law. So, once again, the nation has been totally misled. An uber-left-wing hack climate change activist disguised as a scientist and envoy writes the final review, the last chapter review of the whole thing. It gets published under false premises.

This is why Trump is so valuable. You realize how many people would cave to the pressure on this? Most would say, “Well, if my administration put it out, I have to back it. If my administration put this out, I can’t disavow my own administration.” But there’s Trump doing so.

RUSH: Yes, yes, yes, I know about it. There’s a 7.0 magnitude earthquake in Anchorage, Alaska, and the cable news networks are on the case showing the damage. There are predictions of tsunamis, tsunami warnings in some of the coastal areas. Do you know what a tsunami is? Most people I would submit to you do not know what a tsunami is. And you can’t blame ’em. They’ve watched movies with tsunamis. A tsunami is portrayed as a gigantic wave that comes out of nowhere and drowns everybody, 30-foot, 40-foot waves.

No, that’s not what a tsunami is. A tsunami can result in the overall water level, sea level climbing. But a tsunami — this actually kind of hard to explain, knowing full well that there are scientific experts. Remember in the old days, Mr. Snerdley, when I would attempt to explain something scientifically and they would all call and tell me to shut up, that I’m not a scientist and I ought not be trying to explain these things? Since those days, I have established myself as a scientific expert primarily in the area of climate change.

By the way, I asked myself a question earlier: How in the world is it that somebody like Christie Todd Whitman, a Republican establishment member extraordinaire is out reciting climate change gibberish in terminology exactly like any run-of-the-mill leftist. And the answer is they’re paid. They work at think tanks. They’re paid. People promote studies. They’re paid to have these beliefs in many areas, scientific areas, special interests. Not political — see, that’s another brilliant aspect of this. Climate change is not categorized as a political issue, which is all it is. It’s not science.

They want you to believe that it’s science, but it isn’t. If it’s science, then there cannot be any legitimate claim to climate change because not every scientist agrees! And science is not up for a vote. Scientific fact is scientific fact. It’s not scientific opinion. So a consensus of scientists believing anything does not make it science. And there are some really brilliant scientists out there who tell you that the so-called science behind climate change is as bogus as anything they’ve ever seen. So it’s all politics. But it takes place under the rubric of science, like the Mueller investigation is happening under the umbrella of the legal system and the Department of Justice, when it’s nothing more than a political opposition research campaign being run by a lawyer. That’s all it is.

Now, CNN — oh, the tsunami. What a tsunami is basically, you can’t see it. It’s beneath the surface. And it’s because of an earthquake which also, in terms of the ocean, is beneath the surface; so the ocean floor moves. This causes essentially — there’s two phases to it. Water will be seen to be receding from the shoreline, and then when it comes back, it comes back at a much higher level.

Now, there can be, if it’s really dramatic, there can be some waves on the surface associated with it. But most of the waves of a tsunami are beneath the surface. They result in flooding. They can result in a massively elevated sea level. But a tsunami is not automatically this gigantic wave that you see from way over on the horizon and you say, “Man, Mabel, we got 10 minutes to maybe outrun it,” because you can’t see it coming.

Remember, there was an earthquake in I think Central America, South America, some ten years ago, and they issued tsunami warnings for as far away as Hawaii. So CNN and cable news networks fired up the cameras on the shoreline at Oahu and the Big Island and they’re waiting for the gigantic wave. Remember this? And there is no gigantic wave, but yet the tsunami is happening. And people who knew what they were doing in Oahu got on their boats and took the boats out because a wave wasn’t gonna swamp them.

The tsunami could flood their boat theoretically, depending on how it reacted with the shoreline. But you get away from shore, you get out there and you just ride the tsunami as it comes in and goes out. But you don’t, for the most part, most tsunamis you’ll not see it. It’s all beneath. You see the results of it. So it was kind of funny.

The media didn’t know. The media was expecting this gigantic wave. And at the moment the U.S. Geological Survey or whatever was telling people, “This is it, the tsunami is hitting right now.” CNN’s anchors are looking out over the ocean, “I don’t see it yet, Brooke, do you, huh? We got a sharp eye out over here Anderson. We’re looking for the wave, but we don’t see it.” But it was happening right in front of ’em.

Now, it turned out to be a very minor tsunami effect as far away as Hawaii. But they had people tracking it as it was moving from off the coast of Chile or wherever it was all the way across the Pacific. They had their scientific algorithms and their diagrams, and they were trying to show where. And people were looking for this gigantic wave because just like in the China Syndrome, nuclear power means a meltdown and a poisoning of everything. Tsunami means this gigantic tidal wave. A tidal wave is not necessarily associated with a tsunami.

You’ve seen people out there surfing on these 15, 20-foot waves. No tsunami caused that. That’s just a confluence of meteorological factors, largely wind creating waves on the surface of the ocean. But a tsunami, a legitimate tsunami resulting from an earthquake is gonna happen beneath the surface of the water. Because the earthquake can’t happen on the ocean. The ocean can’t move on its place. It’s a bunch of water. It will go wherever its container lets it go. (interruption) The ocean floor moves, yeah, with an earthquake, obviously. And when the ocean floor moves and rearranges itself that has effect on all the water above it.

A tsunami is a giant sucking of water away from the coastline and then bringing it back. But it doesn’t happen instantly. It takes a while. We’re talking about a massive amount of water that has to be moved. But you can see the sea level climb and get big. Now, in some cases they are so massive that you will see a wave on the surface. But for the most part a tsunami is not something you actually see. You see the results of it, but you don’t see it actually happening.

I imagine your phone’s ringing off the hook and there are people saying, “He doesn’t know what he was talking about. I saw a tsunami once and it ruined my hut.” Could be Obama’s brother calling.

My 17 yr old son is pretty savvy...he is like y the only problem solving constitutionalist in his school...recall that PSC, is the new term for conservative.

He says there are two types of liberals...the first are the true evil ones, who lead the pack and like t know better, but have power and $ at the expense of those they lead. The other are liberals like his student friends who do what the leaders want.

Why do I say this?

Whitman is one of the former...I surmise this climate hoaxers make $ off of CC, just like Gore. Pure evil.

When the tanned irishman was President, his VP Biden actually said, what is the down side to taking Climate control action ? That was perhaps the most ill informed and idiotic statement I have heard in years. So the VP of King Climate Change was not even briefed on the potential downside of cooling a planet within a cycling ice age ? Just how stupid are these people ? And how in the world can you say climate change is so bad that we have to do more climate change ? Now we know why these idiots ran up 20 trillion in debt. At this point a civil war would be cheaper.

When I was in the second grade, some weirdos predicted the world would end on some date. That date came and went and the world rolled on.

When I was in the third grade, some weirdos predicted the world would end on some date. That date came and went and the world rolled on.

When I was in the fourth grade, some weirdos predicted the world would end on some date. That date came and went and the world rolled on.

I thought all that pseudo-religious was in the past. Then along came Al Gore and his continually changing progression of when Glow-Bull warming will destroy the planet.

About that government report on climate: The MSM liberals cherry-picked information to choose the worst-case scenarios while ignoring the safe minor-case end of the scenario scales.

Each case presented a what-if scale showing least impact, and possible extremely bad impact. Of course, reporters chose the worst (unlikely) impact of climate change. It's like saying the next sun-spot cycle could result in a chance of a little rain where you normally get hurricanes, but there's the possibility that the Earth could have the atmosphere totally burned away - both ends of the scale highly unlikely.

Climate Change believers always choose the highly unlikely worst-case scenarios on reports. Sane people take a more logical approach to reading possible scenarios. Otherwise you'll believe that each new day will result in doomsday for the Earth - not likely to happen for thousands (or millions) of years.

Anthropomorphic Warming is real.

But all it has done is slow down the inevitable.

It’s not that we don’t believe that there is climate change.

It’s that we don’t believe the ruling elite can stop it no matter how much money of ours they take.

It has been happening for 14 billion years and no one has ever been able to prevent it. It is just the nature of our solar system.

What is so frightening about this hoax, is that it illustrates how easily a large number of people can be manipulated. That people are so gullible and so willing to believe anything they are told enough times.. Take a minutes to research what % of the greenhouse gases that is man-made CO2. CO2 makes up 3.02 % of the greenhouse gases. 97 % of that 3 % are from natural sources in the environment. So man-made CO2 is 3 % of the overall CO2 3%.

That’s only .117 %. That’s right, mankind’s contribution to the CO2 in the greenhouses gases is only .117% . Not even a total moron would believe that.117% could affect earth’s temperature.

Here are the facts, Point # 5 summarizes everything
https://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

30 Nov: WUWT: Anthony Watts: #Climategate continues – (Michael) Mann tries to get ahead of his legal problem, releases his own version of emails
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/11/30/climategate-continues-mann-tries-to-get-ahead-of-his-legal-problem-releases-his-own-version-of-emails/

I think this is Anthony Watts’ first day back at WUWT in about three weeks.

He lives very close to the terrible fire that raged through north central California a few weeks ago.

He knew many of the people who lost their homes and businesses, and he was working full time to help them get back on their feet.

The consistently high quality of “Watts Up With That” really depends on Anthony, and whenever he is away for a while, you can really notice the change.

Our contribution to global warming is minimal at best, all these progressive/communists who believe this seldom if ever talk about solar cycles.

To them that bright object in the sky has little to no impact on our weather/climate.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.