Replies

You were not the standard bearer of the GOP under three Bush Presidencies. Or the head of the RNC as Bush 41 once was. The Bush family has profited mightily by its association with the GOP. They had a duty and obligation to support the duly elected nominee of the party. Jeb even pledged to do so. Where is their honor and loyalty? They not only refused to endorse Trump, they worked actively against him.

Not only did they not support Trump, some of them said they were voting for Hillary. Bush 43 has voiced his criticism of the Trump presidency while remaining silent about what Obama did. And there has not been a peep out of them criticizing the attempted coup of Trump, the most serious political scandal in the history of the Republic.

Bush class and decorum? A heaping, steaming pile of BS. They are founding members of the Uniparty. Their friendship with the criminal Clinton family is disgusting and reeks of hypocrite when it comes to the treatment of Trump. The grifters hang together. Bush 41 got his multi-million dollar payoff from the Kuwaitis.

I don't give a sh!t about who was the "standard bearer of the GOP" for all those years. I'm not a Republican, and I've never been one ... so I have no interest in what kind of obligations a losing primary candidate might have in the general election.

The way the Bush family treated Trump during the 2016 campaign spoke volumes about what the GOP is all about -- and (more importantly) what it is not all about. Trump's stature as a candidate improved dramatically in my eyes when I saw that whole charade unfold. I supported him because he was NOT a real Republican. And guess what ... I suspect a lot of Democrats saw the Bush treatment of Trump as compelling evidence that a Hillary Clinton administration would be almost 100% identical to what Bush 43 brought to the White House: a total sellout to Wall Street and foreign interests. I wonder if Trump would have even gotten a lot of those Democrat votes if anyone with the last name "Bush" had endorsed him.