Skip to comments.
Justice Kennedy's Hubris
American Thinker ^
| 12-2-2018
| Nancy Pearcey
Posted on 12/02/2018 1:21:34 PM PST by servo1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Williams; SunkenCiv
100,000 children living in homosexual “marriages”?
Lesbian-lesbian co-habitation?
Or pure exaggeration by the usual liberal suspects in Alensky’s national press corpse?
21
posted on
12/02/2018 3:16:06 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(The democrats' national goal: One world social-communism under one world religion: Atheistic Islam.)
To: servo1969
Very well written and true. Kennedy is a very evil man. His comment about Kavanaugh proves his immorality. God will take care of him eventually.
22
posted on
12/02/2018 4:01:18 PM PST
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: servo1969
Yeah, Roberts, you were right, no activist judges. May your rot in hell with him.
23
posted on
12/02/2018 4:02:36 PM PST
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Yeah, Roberts, you were right, no activist judges. May you rot in hell with him. Didn't want to be remanded to grammar hell.
24
posted on
12/02/2018 4:03:31 PM PST
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: servo1969
just super. Precisely what Justice Scalia lay awake nights worrying that he himself might, unconsciously, do. If he found himself liking his opinion too much, he would go over his logic the more thoroughly lest where he stood on any decision should depend on where he sat on the matter.
To: servo1969
how bout it was wrong to let queers adopt children for their own amusement in the first place???
26
posted on
12/02/2018 5:38:55 PM PST
by
Chode
( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
To: servo1969
27
posted on
12/02/2018 7:11:34 PM PST
by
jimfree
(My18 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
To: servo1969
IIRC, Kennedy even said as much at the hearings, that the court would have to be extremely arrogant to redefine marriage. Then he did it anyway.
28
posted on
12/02/2018 7:22:23 PM PST
by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
To: servo1969
We knew at the time he was following his own immoral compass.
29
posted on
12/03/2018 12:08:34 AM PST
by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
To: servo1969
O’Connor did this before Kennedy. In the Planned Parenthood vs. Pennsylvania decision she thought it was an undue burden for a married woman to inform her husband before she had an abortion because . . . well, because Sandra Day thought she might have been raped or molested and, after all, it was HER body.
30
posted on
12/03/2018 11:13:09 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(The politicized state destroys all aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
To: Vigilanteman
Tells us much about Reagan judicial picks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson