She’s a nasty, vile creature. And I’m not referring to her saying $hit.
Classless, yet worshipped by the Leftist masses. Also, I remember reading that Moochie was surprised that she got into Princeton with the SAT scores she had. And I thought ‘doesn’t she realize she is an Affirmative Action recipient?’.
Be nice if he’d just go back to his husband and leave the rest of us alone.
Interpretation: "I am as phony as my phony husband."
Has anyone else noticed how often she appears on TV shows? I think back to other First Ladies and their appearance on TV and cannot remember one. But then, those earlier First Ladies had some class.
Can’t imagine Melania saying “that s&&& don’t work”. Ever!
To me, Sandberg is saying that women need to spend time (hopefully in her nifty “Lean In Circles”) thinking and sharing and communicating about the things they can change in their professional and personal lives in order to better obtain their goals. To Sandberg, women have been held back by body language, speaking voice, and our tendency as women to shy away from speaking out because, essentially, we lack self-confidence.
I have to say that I totally agree with this. I get very insecure sometimes even writing these blogs or doing my shows and I have to remind myself again and again to just dive in, take the plunge, and trust my gut. It’s scary. But even scarier to me is not doing it, so I essentially force myself. For example, I didn’t even think this piece on Lean In was too hot (and my husband told me last night: “You can’t write it if you didn’t finish the book!”) but I decided on my own that I didn’t think that was the point. The point is to get the conversation going, about women, about us, about how we ideally want our lives to be, and how we want our work to be. So at the risk of failure and ridicule, I’m plunging in here.
https://cloudmom.com/motherhood/what-does-sheryl-sandbergs-lean-in-really-mean/
As a woman, I need to say that I am so sick and tired of all the bean counting in every human activity. God created men and women for a purpose - not to be the same, but to be complementary. So what if the majority of political leaders are men.
Women who have sufficient leadership qualities, and who voice the concerns of the majority of voters will win, and hopefully be good leaders. Example: Margaret Thatcher.
I honestly don’t know where this came from, but every time I read a quote from her, starting in 2009, I start hearing the theme of “The Jeffersons” in my head. It was a spontaneous thing.
At first, I thought Mike was talking about concealment advice.
She “leaned in” hard with her do-nothing hospital job, garnering $350K+ for figuring out how to turf poor people away from high-brow private hospitals to a county hospital.
Later on that day she was also overheard saying, “goonie goo goo.”
Why would anyone care what she thinks only thing she is a is a disbarred lawyer.
Real classy there, huh.
Is that the Gospel that comes between the Gospels of Luke and John?
“We deserve those jobs?”
I think you meant to say that you need to earn those jobs. I haven’t seen one iota of proof that Michelle is capable of starting or growing a business, let alone running one.
One high school guidance counselor told Obama that she wasn’t “Princeton material.”
I call bullshit on that statement. Actually it is Asians with SAT scores 200 points higher than whites, and other minorities who are being told they aren’t Princeton material. No guidance councilors would tell an affirmative action applicant they weren’t Princeton material. That would be RACIST!
Now she and VJ are going to go full on Communist.
Breaking heads, taking names, restart the Gulag.