Strike one against Trump is appointing Sessions, then getting completely reck'd by the deep state plot of the RR -> SC referral that caught him completely off-guard. Maybe he's really not that smart.
Strike two against Trump is failing to initiate action at critical points in his administration, rather than take measured risks in upsetting and turning the tables. Maybe he's not really the risk take he promotes.
Strike three is maybe Trump really is just the promoter he's always actually demonstrated over the last 35 years. His constant Twitter insults, whining & complaining, interspersed with periodic touts, is funny if there is a prospect of victory. But as critical moments are passed that lessen his advantages, the incessant braying simply becomes outright embarrassing.
If Trump is impeached, he really has no one else to blame other than himself. Who else would squander 50% support in a nation of 325m people out of fear of possible civil war? Rather, he allows one side to be vanquished without a fight, handing over 175m to the (future) gulags.
So basically, you only have one solipsistic, tendentious strike against him, and two nebulous, gratuitous criticisms that could just as reasonably be disdained as entertained.
I think it's probably a safe bet Trump was "out" in your book long before your contrived "umpire" prattle.