Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lgjhn23
My Father in Law was overhead of the beaches in a USMC Corsair on that day and his observation in regards to flame weapons was that there was about 15 seconds worth of flame in the tank and then you had to lug it all over the battle until you could get a refill because if you dropped it you caught hell from the commanders who wanted to use them further inland as well. Then there was the stark terror of lugging the dang thing before you expended the fuel because all JAP snipers were looking for the guys carrying the tanks and they aimed for the tank not the guy, thus insuring immolation.
18 posted on 12/04/2018 10:01:03 AM PST by ExSoldier ("Terrorists: They hate you yesterday, today, and tomorrow. End it, no more tomorrows for them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ExSoldier

The modern approach is to use an APC or tank to haul the fuel and spray.

The diesel that runs the thing is mixed with an oxidizer and surfactant and sprayed in.


19 posted on 12/04/2018 12:33:02 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: ExSoldier
I had familiarization handling of a flame thrower during my training at Ft Knox. It wasn’t all that heavy and I have to admit it was a kick to operate. They were deployed in the assault against the caves with great effect.
23 posted on 12/04/2018 1:55:27 PM PST by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson