To: lgjhn23
My Father in Law was overhead of the beaches in a USMC Corsair on that day and his observation in regards to flame weapons was that there was about 15 seconds worth of flame in the tank and then you had to lug it all over the battle until you could get a refill because if you dropped it you caught hell from the commanders who wanted to use them further inland as well. Then there was the stark terror of lugging the dang thing before you expended the fuel because all JAP snipers were looking for the guys carrying the tanks and they aimed for the tank not the guy, thus insuring immolation.
18 posted on
12/04/2018 10:01:03 AM PST by
ExSoldier
("Terrorists: They hate you yesterday, today, and tomorrow. End it, no more tomorrows for them!)
To: ExSoldier
The modern approach is to use an APC or tank to haul the fuel and spray.
The diesel that runs the thing is mixed with an oxidizer and surfactant and sprayed in.
19 posted on
12/04/2018 12:33:02 PM PST by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
To: ExSoldier
I had familiarization handling of a flame thrower during my training at Ft Knox. It wasnt all that heavy and I have to admit it was a kick to operate. They were deployed in the assault against the caves with great effect.
23 posted on
12/04/2018 1:55:27 PM PST by
hinckley buzzard
(Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson