When you go to the feds and admit you have stolen documents that prove a crime and want whistleblower status, their first question will be “what else do you have?”. Because if you’ve cherry-picked info to prove your case and held back exculpatory information, they know their whole case could fall apart and they’d be responsible. So they get a search warrant so they can prove they exercised due diligence.
Remember, they have no reason to implicitly believe the whistleblower, they have to build a case that can stand up in court.
Correct.
That could very well be the basis written in the warrant application by either White Hats or the Black Hats.
The problem we have is the existence of dirty cops at all levels acting under color of law and forced under blackmail to perform as prescribed.
Other scenarios are that other materials were planted in the Whistleblower’s premises to provide a trace or to otherwise mislead, or to throw the Clintonites off-track.
Bottomline is the corruption needs to be taken out, we can’t have, we can’t live with a politicized corrupt DOJ/FBI.
“When you go to the feds and admit you have stolen documents that prove a crime and want whistleblower status, their first question will be “what else do you have?”. Because if you’ve cherry-picked info to prove your case and held back exculpatory information, they know their whole case could fall apart and they’d be responsible. So they get a search warrant so they can prove they exercised due diligence.
Remember, they have no reason to implicitly believe the whistleblower, they have to build a case that can stand up in court.”
Makes sense to me