Posted on 12/05/2018 2:57:13 AM PST by a little elbow grease
Funny.
You wilt when met with expertise and knowledge and experience and someone who thoroughly knows your snake oil.
I’d be happy to talk to you about the topic in a non-judge mental dispassionate manner, but you’re the one playing evangelist and self-righteous enlightened judge.
“that’s why Schultes told Burroughs that he saw all sorts of colors and patterns when on ayahuasca.”
Of course he saw it. It’s a neurological response.
Schultes said it was all nothing, though. Despite and because of the fireworks show.
Burroughs was in fact a lot similar.
Read Academy 23.
Of course Burroughs did need psychedelic drugs to believe his things.
“People are conservative as far as governance for many reasons. Not all are social conservatives. I’d think you’d have noticed this before now.”
Nope. Doesn’t work that way. There is self-deception, though.
And a handful of rare oddballs.
“Of course Burroughs did need psychedelic drugs to believe his things.”
Of course that should be “did not”.
“LOL......... that’s why Schultes told Burroughs that he saw all sorts of colors and patterns when on ayahuasca.”
What’s funny is you don’t even understand Schultes comments, which was my point the whole time.
So much for you being a student of set setting and context b
____________
Not to be a devil's advocate, but what is to be said about the "legislative and bureaucratic" limits put on the good old NATURAL poppies which are turned into what some call dangerous drugs? Are those actions "excessive" presently?
"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool .... than to speak and to remove all doubt."
"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool .... than to speak and to remove all doubt."
_______________
You don't want a judge around???
;-)
Of course he saw it. It’s a neurological response.
_________________________
Can't you see what you just admitted?
You just said Schultes saw the colors because "it’s a neurological response". YOU JUST ADMITTED that ayahuasca caused him to see interesting things.
THAT IS EXACTLY WHY SOME PEOPLE WANT TO USE THINGS LIKE LSD.
You just admitted what you have been arguing AGAINST all day long.
You're out of your league.
___
Your understanding is very narrow and limited. You know you, and you know who you know. You know very little outside of that, this much is obvious. How about doing us all a favor and stop trying to run off decent Trump supporters who might not quite measure up to your exquisitely virtuous variety of conservatism? Can you manage that?
Lol.
Schultes point was it was meaningless.
(I’m beginning to think you’re brain damaged) b
The onus is on you to document this huge block of conservative dopers you posit.
(And I’m not trying to “run anyone off”) m
You’ve got to be over 80, you’ve got that brain lock thing going on. Nobody’s called them dopers since Dragnet was on the air.
Dopers. It’s just a fact, Ma’am.
What are you some sort of women’s libber with the hipster slang?
There is no hope in dope!
I don’t think it’s going to be a good thing, there are going to be regrets. But, the country is clearly headed in the direction of legalization. Even here in North Carolina there’s quite the rush going on to get permitted for grow operations and dispensaries. To the upside, the ridiculous, expensive and invasive “war on drugs” that has led to civil asset forfeiture and corrupted police forces across the country will become far less invasive. Like it or not, it’s coming.
Note how you don’t answer the substance.
What substance? You’re knee-jerking in the face of reality, which is the country is legalizing. Slang from the 50’s is not going to persuade anyone to avoid marijuana or mushrooms. I promise you, you sound hilarious to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.