To: reasonisfaith
It would be reasonable on a general level as well, given the fact that the assumptions of science are very often changed by empirical necessity. You're right reasonisfaith - if that wasn't the case it would be 'religion' not 'science'...
19 posted on
12/05/2018 9:52:28 AM PST by
GOPJ
(The enemy of the United States pays for drum circles at 'protests'. Watch for them.)
To: GOPJ
No, that’s not quite an accurate statement because the principle of changing particular assumptions based on empirical findings applies to religion as well as to science.
20 posted on
12/05/2018 9:55:41 AM PST by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson