Posted on 12/05/2018 8:26:15 AM PST by C19fan
I’d have paid to have been there for that moment. The savier chiefs would have picked up on that and actually derived a little value out of it.
That's a buzz word, er, term. Historically, there were a number of, maybe half a dozen or so, "world" wars before then.
The one I remember is that the "French and Indian War" in the American Colonies morphed into what the Europeans call the "Seven Years War" or the like, depending on the countries.
IOW, those with the most grievance points on their score cards, not those best qualified, get to have the power. What could go wrong?
I wonder if she means FACTUAL women who have vaginas and estrogen and used to win First Place in Female Sports and Female Beauty Contests; or if she means the NEW Females - men with intact or removed dangly bits and testosterone who claim to FEEL like a woman and go out to win the Formerly Factual Female Sports and Beauty Pageants thereby replacing the actual females and making them invisible and insignificant and real right-wing bitches if they complain about it.
Do you think Jellybrain will clarify this information?
Wrong. Our future is a bloody civil war followed by a “die-off” in which millions will die. This “intersectional” crap will die then, too.
“Rich white hetero women are close to the bottom of the totem pole...”
Nah, non-elite white heteros are at the bottom of the totem pole. There are different rules for the elites. All that lip service to “diversity” and “intersectionality” is just a ruse to keep the plebes placated.
Silly Gilly the airhead, still making about as much sense as The Straw man.
LOL. I still have my old Buzzword Bingo spreadsheet. Finally got tired of adding words to it.
Seriously, the 19th was all about communism.
Women vote left of men as a bloc, and are the biggest bloc. Collectivists do not care about individuals, they care about blocs.
Progressives - the fellow travelers - are communists with a euphemistic label. They do not care about women’s rights, they care about communism. Only their useful idiots believe otherwise.
From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry for “Feminist Perspectives on Power”.
The goal of theories of intersectionality is to develop a single framework for analyzing power that encompasses sexism, racism, class oppression, heterosexism, and other axes of oppression in their complex interconnections.
IMHO, it is an explanation by the arrogant of why they lack power. Instead of attempting to render a service they believe others owe them a service and when lacking claim they have been socially deprived that entitlement. From there they further degenerate into categorizing all the “-isms” of the world which oppress their thinking and ideas of success.
Intersectionism claims those who fare the worst are those with multiple “-isms” oppressing them.
Nuts!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.