Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump shrugs off future debt crisis: ‘I won’t be here’
Washington Examiner ^ | December 05, 2018 02:28 PM | Caitlin Yilek

Posted on 12/05/2018 8:09:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

President Trump is dismissing the importance of paying down the national debt, saying he won’t be in office to take blame for the nation's fiscal crisis when it becomes even more unsustainable, according to a report Wednesday.

The national debt sits at $21 trillion and counting. As a candidate, when the national debt was $19 trillion, Trump promised to erase the entire debt “over a period of eight years.”

Senior administration officials showed Trump charts and graphics in early 2017 that illustrated a “hockey stick” spike in the debt in the coming years. Trump said the data showed the national debt would only become untenable after he left office, the Daily Beast reported.

“Yeah, but I won’t be here,” Trump said.

People close to the president told the news outlet that the national debt never actually bothered Trump, despite his public comments about it.

“I never once heard him talk about the debt,” one former White House official said.

White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said it’s also the responsibility of Congress to cut back on spending.

“While the president has and will continue to do everything in his power to rein in Washington’s out-of-control spending, the Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse, and it’s time for them to work with this president to reduce the debt,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 115th; debt; trumpbudget
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: chris37
No, he won’t be there, and America just put the Demonrats back in charge of the purse, so I don’t think Americans really give a crap about it anyway.

19 trillion? 21 trillion? At this point the numbers become meaningless.

81 posted on 12/06/2018 3:49:48 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
The debt/unfunded liability problem was, until Trump, a core tenet of American conservatism.

Trump isn't a conservative. He's never been one. He didn't run as one.

82 posted on 12/06/2018 3:51:17 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: northside
according to a “SOURCE” who was in the room.

That guy! He's always talking!

83 posted on 12/06/2018 3:53:47 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The debt only matters to Republicans when a Democrat is in the White House and it only matters to Democrats when a Republican is in the White House.


84 posted on 12/06/2018 4:00:09 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
With a Democrat House, spending cuts are DOA.

They were DOA when it was a Republican House as well.

85 posted on 12/06/2018 4:01:32 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
The best thing Trump can do to deal with future debt is grow the economy, which is exactly what he has done and is continuing to do.

If your economy is growing at three to four percent and your spending is growing a seven percent then you're still digging yourself into a hole. If we're running an $800 billion deficit in this economy then how high will it get when there's downturn and recession?

86 posted on 12/06/2018 4:06:25 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I agree.


87 posted on 12/06/2018 4:07:24 AM PST by flippyflea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead

It is acknowledged by both parties that taking responsible steps to address the debt means losses at the polls. Enough Americans want the illusion of prosperity to keep this façade going.

Never mind Social Security, Medicare, etc.; this country has lost the will to cut welfare spending.


88 posted on 12/06/2018 4:11:46 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
It hasn't been anything more than lip service for Republicans since Reagan. If you look at the deficit/debt it started to rise under Reagan and Bush I. Then increased slightly and leveled off under Clinton. Exploded under Bush II then Obama put it on Hyper drive. I'm at the point now where I want the budget balanced and the debt paid done. I don't care if this is done by raising revenue(i.e. raise taxes, raise tariffs, sell government property, etc) cutting spending or a combination of the two.
89 posted on 12/06/2018 4:24:12 AM PST by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Who could be against spending the same amount (2018) levels for 20 years? Lol! No-ROFLOL!!! I’ve just retired after 31 years of being in the military, and I can tell you the list of who would be against that is LONG and DISTINGUISHED! Bless your heart (as we say here in Texas). That’s the most naive statement about government spending I think I’ve ever read.

I don’t mean to say it shouldn’t be done or that we must not reduce government spending-for we must. Trump was either lying or extremely naive himself if he thought for a second we would erase the deficit during 8 years of his presidency without radical government cuts. However, to suggest that everyone would be ok with it, as your post does, is insane or just plain out of touch with reality of how the government really operates and what it is.

Have you ever put together a FINPLAN for a government agency or sat on a financial management board for a government entity? Your post suggests you have not.

90 posted on 12/06/2018 4:24:46 AM PST by NELSON111 (Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

not just mexico but any foreign country money is sent out to by illegals and foreigners working or attending school or living inthe USA


91 posted on 12/06/2018 4:45:07 AM PST by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onona; All

if 63million voters for Trump donate (get full federal/ state tax credit on) $396.83 each (or best they can and others who can send a bit more) to Whomever Trump says will rightly handle the money for the full wall- border security construction, we’d have more than $25billion and show the house and senate we(voters) mean business


92 posted on 12/06/2018 5:02:37 AM PST by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because there's still a Democrat Party I bought some more American Eagles gold coins on Saturday and Monday...

Trump or no Trump in office, with or without a big wall built, this will NOT end well. It's very serious and could unravel sooner rather than later.

I wish Trump would move the debt issue to the front burner ASAP - at least that way when things go south, he can say he was starkly aware of it and point to decades of mainly democRat big-government programs, inflationary finance, chronic borrowing facilitated with the Fed's help.

93 posted on 12/06/2018 5:15:13 AM PST by 4Liberty ("The Democrats are the Party of Crime." - Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

The debt problem is an entitlement/transfer payment problem.

He can’t fix that all on his own,


94 posted on 12/06/2018 5:32:54 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So much for the campaign promise(s).


95 posted on 12/06/2018 5:35:58 AM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

So you don’t think Trump has kept as many promises as he can?

And you think a President can solve the entitlement/transfer payment (AKA debt) problem all by himself?


96 posted on 12/06/2018 5:39:23 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

And the real number is a LOT bigger than that.


97 posted on 12/06/2018 5:39:49 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Eliminating 90% of the federal government would be a nice start, but of course no one is going to work towards that... the beast is self-sustaining at this point.


98 posted on 12/06/2018 5:43:50 AM PST by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You could be asking a rhetorical question.


99 posted on 12/06/2018 5:45:33 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

70% of the federal government’s expenditures are entitlements/transfer payments.

https://www.investors.com/politics/policy-analysis/us-government-payments-to-individuals-70-of-budget/

What happens when those checks stop coming?


100 posted on 12/06/2018 5:47:00 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson