She is willing to do anything.
Dear Kirsten Gillibrand,
You are “white” so you need to just shut up and get to the back of the bus. The future is not for privileged pompous white females, either.
As I watch the Asian and Hispanic hordes pour into Gillibrand’s state of NY, and my neighboring state of NJ, I assure you it doesn’t bode well for females. These are not “progressive” populations being trafficked here to replace the fleeing and dying Americans, but people primitive enough to still have families.
Someone must have gotten Gillibrand a dictionary for her birthday. She found some “big words” to use to make herself sound cool, modern, hip & informed.
Gillibrand is espousing neo-Marxist concepts. “Intersectionality” is a more recent idea developed by Marxists, to incorporate race, sex, gender, sexuality, etc...into their general ideas about oppression and class struggle.
Yes, the rot is that deep, now that American Senators promote this ideology.
Maybe the Soviet Union won the Cold War after all.
When she was running for Congress her nickname was “Silly Gilly” as she is a total bubblehead.
I have to believe she is attempting to position herself for VP as the requirements for that position are solely to get some additional votes for the “man” she is hoping to partner with to get him some feminist votes.
Humans, and mammals, are in two sexes. Sexual reproduction favors the long term strength of the species. Eliminating one of the two removes that evolutionary advantage and leads to the extinction of the species.
At that future “intersectional”, is there a stop sign or a yield sign?
To these people men are either just dumb beasts who can lift heavy things or they are evil destroyers of the planet. Especially white men who have been in charge and stuffed everything up, supposedly. They believe their own lies that when women are in charge all wars will end and there will be unicorns and butterflies. Give me a break.
almost no regular American voter knows what the hell “intersectional” means (I for one don’t and don’t care to look it up) ... so how many voters are going to vote for a candidate who spouts stuff they don’t know what it is that they’re saying? ... promoting that kind of academic bullshit language isn’t exactly connecting with most voters, now is it?
Open your own jars from now on, then.