Posted on 12/06/2018 12:23:20 PM PST by Kaslin
My question for Congressjerk Eric Swalwell is pretty simple: “How many Americans would you murder to achieve your goal of disarming us?”
It’s a fair question.
Swalwell is the MSNBC stalwart who recently wrote an op-ed advocating that the government confiscate the guns that make people like him wet themselves and imprison those of us who decline to surrender them. Millions of Americans own these basic tools of freedom, which the ignorant call “assault weapons,” and these loyal citizens keep and bear them to protect themselves, their families, their communities and their Constitution. But Rep. Swalwell would make these citizens felons, though these patriots are only a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants.
Of course, he wants to make these patriots felons because they are a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants. After all, that’s what leftist Democrats like him are.
Now, we know that some Americans would resist this kind of tyranny. People all over the world are resisting the elite’s commands. The Brits Brexited. The French are rioting because they don’t want to sacrifice their livelihoods on behalf of the global elites’ weird weather religion. And a decree that the Second Amendment is not a thing anymore would certainly provoke some serious pushback here.
That’s why it’s fair to ask Rep. Bloodlust how much blood he’s prepared to shed to achieve his goal of disarming Normal Americans.
Rep. Swalwell, some people are going to fight rather than cave in, so what’s the number of bodies you would be willing to pile up to win? Let’s put aside the right or wrong of resistance; it’ll be a thing. It’ll happen. You’re from near San Francisco, so you don’t know any real Americans, but even though I am from that hellhole too, I’ve met a few Americans in my travels. They are an ornery people who don’t give in to the kind of bullying you advocate. So, you’re going to have to kill some people to do what you want, and I just want to know how many you’re prepared to off to achieve your goal.
After all, it’s not as if you Democrats don’t already have a history of killing people for having guns you disapprove of.
Remember Waco? The raid on David Koresh’s compound was because his weird band of misfits allegedly had scary, outlawed guns. That’s why Democrat Janet Reno initially decided to send in the troops. The government got four of our ATF agents killed, then slaughtered the resisters, including women and kids.
Was it worth it? Maybe these creepy cultists were violating the law, but was making sure they didn’t have guns that were scary worth shooting or burning alive about 80 people, including four cops?
Was it?
So, in light of his party’s track record, I want to know how many people Rep. Swalwell – who fancies himself a potent Democrat presidential contender – is prepared to see die so he can ensure Americans are disarmed in order to please the liberal Californians he represents. How many?
One?
One hundred?
One thousand?
One hundred thousand?
More?
How many corpses would Eric Swalwell and his blue state buddies accept because they don’t think some law-abiding citizen in Oklahoma should be allowed to choose what kind of weapon he has, because they think they should choose for him, and that that choice should be “None?”
On Twitter, which is a wonderful thing because it makes people truly reveal themselves, one gentleman pointed out the not-so-far-fetched notion that mass gun confiscation (let’s leave the problematic logistics for the gun-hating fascists aside) would spark a civil war. But Rep. Swalwell was not worried; he observed that a bunch of citizens with rifles could not stand up to a military armed with nuclear weapons.
Well, that’s a troubling notion.
Now, Congressman Strangelove properly took a lot of grief for suggesting nuking fellow Americans, but even if you accept his backtracking about how this was a joke – nothing’s funnier than suggesting the mass murder of fellow Americans! – he only put nukes off limits. What killing systems are still on the table? Infantry? Artillery? Bombers? Because his answer assumed that he would support prosecuting a war against those who failed to obey and submit to arrest.
So, Congressman, what means of destructions are still on the table to use against fellow Americans who refuse to allow you to strip them of their Second Amendment rights because you Bay Area liberals want to show those hicks in Jesusland who’s boss? Is shooting them okay? Shelling them? Bombing them, just not with nukes?
Having seen the fruits of oppression overseas, I find this troubling. Actually, that’s putting it lightly. I find it horrifying. I’ve written about it in my novels about how our country could be ripped apart by leftist oppression. My just-released book Wildfire paints a most unpretty picture, but my predictions keep coming true. Try as I might, nothing I write speculating about what they would do if given the chance seems to hold a candle to what people like Congressman Stalin tell us they are actually willing to do to crush us under their Gucci loafers.
Understand that the leftists with Swalwell’s mentality are not driven by notions of justice or reason, but by cold hatred for Normal Americans. We’ve been disobedient. We’ve been defiant. We’ve refused to surrender our means of defending our own sovereignty to our elite overlords, and that is intolerable.
After all, a man without a rifle is not a citizen. He’s a serf, subject to the whims and will of his overlords who you damn well know are never giving up the guns their minions keep and bear.
Look at England. They gave up their guns. Now, the police watch their Twitter feeds and arrest them if they say unapproved things. That’s not a bug to our liberal elite; that’s a feature. That’s the goal.
Wait, this is crazy talk! If we disarm and only a government controlled by the liberal elite has guns, our overlords will be totally cool. They’ll respect our right to say and do what we want. They’ll allow us to practice our religion as we please. You know, just like liberals respect the rights of normal people where they are in control, like on college campuses, or on social media, or in the municipalities that hassle Christian cake shops.
Get woke. They hate you, and your freedom to tell them to pound sand sticks in their collective collectivist craw. Ignore the leftist media and the Fredocon collaborators who demand you not believe your lying eyes or ears when they tell you what they intend to do to you if given the chance.
So, the question remains. Our liberal elite betters think we should be stripped of those scary bangsticks the Constitution protects, and we disagree. So, Rep. Swalwell, how many Americans are you willing to kill to fulfill your vision of a disarmed, defenseless, servile population of docile subjects?
One?
One hundred?
One thousand?
One hundred thousand?
More?
My third novel about America after it splits into two countries, one red and one blue, just dropped. Check out Wildfire and see what could happen if we fail to defend our freedom in the face of people who want to make us Venezuela del Norte.
——It’s the only way to be sure.——
But shouldn’t the totalbe much greater?
I would think perhaps at least 75 million would be a better number
Just to be sure
no /s
None of their own, but plenty of that of their Useful Idiots.
Woof!
Politicians like Can’t-swallow are the exact reason the Second Amendment was created by the founders.
3D printers are going to put an end to the mag ban stupidity.
They would be more subtle and plan the disarmament to occur over two or three generations.
_____________________
That’s the old donks. This new crop of indoctrinated 20-30-nothings want what they want when they want it and they want it now.
If the young cadre overthrows the old guard, they’ll push for disarmament immediately. They’ve shown contempt for the 1st. Why would they go slow on the 2nd? They despise due process. They honor results regardless of means and a stolen election is justified by their ascent to power.
Lucky for us we have a volunteer military and most cops are not total thugs.
The Democratic Socialists will shed the blood of their own in heartbeat if their Antifa types actually take front line positions. It’s the precious bodily fluids of the leadership cadres that will not be willingly shed.
Which means they will be the main targets of both sides.
That’s easy- none of their own.
Exactly. 4th generation warfare. Most of the right, especially those in the military and special forces understand that.
I do not think many on the left do.
Their hold on power is becoming tenuous, and they have been fighting back by attempting to control information flow on the Internet.
One of their old strengths, the ability to self-deceive, is becoming a liability.
Millions. It’s what fascist do.
It worked for Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Castro.
______________________________________
It worked for them due to a traditional peasant class that were actually still serfs.
America’s peasant class is the illegals. Even our worst ghetto didna dunuffins don’t bow to uniformed authority.
The anger in America is already palpable. Actual confiscation attempts will light the fuse.
Every drop of someone else’s blood. Have the leftist ever spilled their own? This us a non article because, history tells the truth.
The real question is which side is most willing to use them. The Left demonstrates quite frequently their capacity to use violence.
Why oh why would the elites elect to have a face-to-face confrontation, when time and demographics will do all the necessary work for them? I assume most people know that firearms are illegal in Mexico - at least for regular 'citizens'. So, since they're already pre-conditioned to accept their positions of servitude, sans any viable means of self defense and/or resistance to tyranny, why wouldn't they make the perfect substitute for future Americans?
Look, I know fantasy sells better than reality, so you have to ramp up a tardish proglib's inopportune truthiness. But, the left didn't gain their positions of power by being stupid; rather, they are quite crafty and know exactly what they're doing promoting open borders.
There's never going to be a confrontation unless the right initiates it before demographics dictates a fait accompli. Keep an eye on France - maybe they will show the way. Trump sure does talk a lot, but from out here in Calif, he hasn't actually accomplished one single thing that was part of his core platform. It really is time to sh!t or get off the pot.
The anger in America is already palpable. Actual confiscation attempts will light the fuse.
We still have hope so we haven’t gone to battle yet.
As long as it’s not theirs they’ll keep sacrificing.
Not so many willing to do confiscations if their own families back home can’t be protected from reprisals. New Orleans was a disorganized mess and the confiscators were assured that they and theirs would be safe from any consequences.
“Eric should read up on fourth generational warfare.”
The military superpowers are way ahead of fourth generation.
See “How to Win a Fifth Generation War”:
https://www.wired.com/2009/01/how-to-win-a-fi/
Israel developed sixth generation strategies which have been copied by the major players. This is the manipulation space, time, and perception. Other players are the U.S., Russia, and China.
See http://mil-embedded.com/guest-blogs/sixth-generation-warfare-manipulating-space-and-time/ .
This gets into things like disinformation designed to get your enemies to bankrupt themselves trying to develop dead-end technology “leaked” to them.
In the near future it will involve AI and robotics. Seventh generation war is fully autonomous:
http://mil-embedded.com/guest-blogs/looking-toward-7th-and-8th-generation-warfare/
We already have young guys fresh out of high school who are operating drones from here in the States to remotely kill targets all over the world. They even get combat and hazard pay from what I hear.
We may even be beyond this now with what is perhaps an eighth generation form of war that directly targets the mind. In a way wars have always been about mind control, but the technology to directly manipulate thoughts and perception may alter the entire way wars are fought in the future. A simple example of this would be taking over all forms of media so that rather than actually winning a war, you would simply announce that you had won it and disclose this “news” through all of the appropriate channels, including official-sounding reports of the leader of your enemy publicly agreeing to an unconditional surrender.
America is currently in a state of war in the form of a quiet coup / cold civil war. But it is precariously close to going hot.
It would be useful for conservatives to draw up a formal declaration of war in which the many various crimes against the republic are specified and connected with precise demands we have to remedy these injustices. What must be addressed are the crimes against humanity being conducted in the form of abortion and the related industries such as the buying and selling of baby body parts for science and the buying and selling of babies through fertility clinics. Further, the LGBTETC agenda must be crushed and future generations protected from these attempts to sexually abuse children. The perpetrators of these crimes must, at the very minimum, be incarcerated and forfeit all of their assets and any means by which they can derive future income. In most cases they should simply be executed.
The Cops know that we know they have families.
Their families live in our neighborhoods.
Same goes for members of the Military.
Cops or Soldiers can’t be everywhere at once, that’s why bad things happen in society in general.
Alot but they want other people to pull the trigger
JoMa
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.