Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Never a word from the Chicken Littles about the pollution in China, the highest in the world, over twice that of the U.S. France is squeaky clean by comparison, yet they’re getting taxed into poverty because of it.


2 posted on 12/07/2018 5:04:54 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Telepathic Intruder
I never notice the pro carbon taxers mentioning the footprint of War. I read somewhere the fuel pollution from military dropping bombs, and filling the air with particulates offsets the carbon emissions from military aircraft. Thus war is good for the environment. But you working peons better pay up for your pollution. 😂😂😂😂😂
14 posted on 12/07/2018 6:38:52 AM PST by sockmonkey (I am an America First, not Israel First FReeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: GOPJ; Jane Long; MinuteGal; jsanders2001; V K Lee; HarleyLady27; stephenjohnbanker; ...
Pres Trump ended US participation in the Paris agreement on climate change, which was designed to cut carbon emissions.

The Paris Agreement is the cause celebre now giving Macron huge problems.

Since entering office, Pres Trump reversed many of Obama’s regulatory mandates that hurt fossil fuels and assisted renewable energy in the marketplace. Trump signed a sweeping executive order in late March at the Environmental Protection Agency that rescinded six of Obama’s climate change executive orders.“

Trump's Exec/Order represents a clear difference between how Trump and former President Barack Obama view the role the United States plays in combating climate change,” CNN reported at the time. The Obama administration became a big “hedge fund” trying to finance and promote renewable energy technologies at any cost, Thomas Pyle, president of the libertarian Institute for Energy Research, told TheDCNF. “The entire eight years of Obama, the Department of Energy was basically a hedge fund — and a bad one — for renewable energy for wind, solar and biofuels,” he said.

Critics of Obama’s renewable energy agenda believe it’s likely a President Hillary would have doubled down on Obama’s renewable energy initiatives.
“If Hillary Clinton had won, then we would have 4-8 more years of the Obama trajectory. Everything labeled ‘progressive energy policy’ would have just ramped up,” Marlo Lewis Jr., a senior fellow at the free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute, told TheDCNF. “So the market would have been even more tilted in favor of so-called ‘green energy companies.

President Trump has basically changed the direction,” he said. (hat tip The Daily Caller report)

17 posted on 12/07/2018 9:29:58 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson