Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kazan
>> No conservative should consider Bush 41 anything but a failure if for no other reason than the fact he put a far-left wing justice on SCOTUS. That was inexcusable. <<

Most GOP presidents would be "failure" by that margin (and mark my words, neither of Trump's SCOTUS picks will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade). Reagan was 1 out of 3 when it came to good conservative SCOTUS appointments (O'Connor and Kennedy both sided with the left on key rulings). Even Coolidge put a horrible New Deal-loving leftist on the court, thinking he would be a good conservative.

I consider Gorsuch to be far more "inexcusable" than Souter. Souter wasn't being tapped to replace an iconic conservative justice and being presented to a GOP-controlled Senate for confirmation.

46 posted on 12/07/2018 9:41:44 PM PST by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy
I consider Gorsuch to be far more "inexcusable" than Souter.

What?! What planet are you living on? Most consider Gorsuch a Scalia clone. Why do you think he isn't conservative/originist enough? Unbelievable.

As far as Reagan goes, you left out the fact he nominated Robert Bork but Bork was borked. Kennedy nor O'Connor were anywhere near as left-wing as Souter. Both were swing-vote moderates.

Souter was as bad Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg. There is absolutely not excuse for putting up someone that liberal.

47 posted on 12/07/2018 10:20:20 PM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson