To: PapaBear3625
I’d be willing to have some employees be non-sexual, and some be sex workers.
For efficiency, only.
13 posted on
12/08/2018 5:59:55 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(You know, when I advised Democrats to vote AFTER Nov 6th, I didn't think they'd actually DO it.)
To: Lazamataz
I’d be willing to have some employees be non-sexual, and some be sex workers. For efficiency, only. But then you would still have the issue of non-sex-worker employees suing for harassment over allegations that they were treated as sex workers. So the only way out is to have all employees be sex workers as an explicit part of their employment contract.
14 posted on
12/08/2018 7:19:46 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
To: Lazamataz
And you would still be the ‘Master of Your Domain’?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson