[antidemoncrat]

Unless I am mistaken, you can own a fully automatic machine gun if you get the proper Federal Permit. Why not do that for bump stocks?

[crosdaddy]

Not in all States, the Fed stamp is fairly reasonable cost wise, the selective fire arms,not so much.

[Simon Green]

Unless I am mistaken, you can own a fully automatic machine gun if you get the proper Federal Permit. Why not do that for bump stocks?

Full autos made after 1986 aren't legal.

[allblues]

The Hughes amendment to the FOPA banned the manufacture of transferable machine guns after May 19, ‘86. If bumpfire stocks are declared to be MGs they will not be eligible to be registered unless there is an ammesty period, which under the Demoncrats will never happen. For the brave soul who is willing to potentially lose his 2nd amendment rights along with his voting rights there is probably a good SCOTUS case under the takings clause, but the risk of losing is quite real, given that Roberts would likely vote with the libs.

[suthener]

“Unless I am mistaken, you can own a fully automatic machine gun if you get the proper Federal Permit. Why not do that for bump stocks?”

I started a reply to your post but found it so logically flawed I didn’t know where to start.

[Svartalfiar]

Unless I am mistaken, you can own a fully automatic machine gun if you get the proper Federal Permit. Why not do that for bump stocks?

Good idea! And while we're at it, we should just go ahead and require a special permit for all the other accessories too! Foregrips, bipods, tripods, monopods, gun rest/vice, scopes, iron sights, steel sights, tritium sights, carry straps, shotshell holders, brass catches, gun cases, cleaning kits, bayonets, flashlights, laser lights, fleshlights, flash suppressors, big magazines, drum mags, small mags, other mags, etc etc etc. Man this is gonna need tens of thousands of new bureaucracy rodents of every level of management and uselessness! $$$$$